Laserfiche WebLink
Soil_and Groundwater Investigation <br /> Based on the analytical results of the soil samples collected during the tank <br /> removal, a site assessment was initiated in August 1992 to determine the extent <br /> Of contamination at the above-referenced site Because previous onsite <br /> investigations have identified the presence of groundwater at depths of less than <br /> 12 feet, a groundwater investigation was also required Prior to the <br /> implementation of field activities, Canonie's workplan dated July 24, 1992 was <br /> submitted for your review Authorization to proceed with the proposed work was <br /> received from the Environmental Health Division on August 4, 1992 <br /> On August 27 , 1992, a soil vapor survey was performed to assist in determining <br /> the vertical and lateral extent of contamination at the subject site A <br /> pneumatic hammer was utilized to drive 9 soil vapor probes to depths of up to 15 <br /> feet in the vicinity of the former tanks Vacuum pumps and charcoal tubes were <br /> used to collect vapor samples from each probe at various depths Immediately <br /> after collection, each sample was submitted to an onsite mobile lab where it was <br /> extracted and injected into a gas chromatograph <br /> The results of the survey suggested that soil contamination was limited to the <br /> area of the north pump island and did not extend laterally to any great degree <br /> A copy of the soil vapor survey report is included as Appendix B of the site <br /> assessment report <br /> During the week of October 5, 1992 , a mobile drill rig was utilized to install <br /> four groundwater monitoring wells and three vadose zone vapor extraction wells <br /> in the vicinity of the former tanks During field activities, soils were found <br /> to consist of loose fine to medium sands to a depth of approximately 15 feet <br /> This strata was underlain by 1-foot to 4-foot thick layer of stiff silty clay <br /> which appeared to act as an aquitard (15 to 19 feet below ground surface) Just <br /> below the clay unit, saturated sands/silty sands were encountered, while moist <br /> silty clays were encountered at 30 feet Boring Logs are included as Appendix <br /> D in the attached report, and well locations are indicated on Figure 2 <br /> Wells Wl, W2 , and W4 were constructed as vadose zone extraction wells Each well <br /> was installed to a depth 15 feet and screened from a depth of 5 feet to the <br /> extent of the well with 4-inch diameter, 0 020-inch slotted well screen Wells <br /> W3, W5, W6, and W7 were installed as groundwater monitoring wells Because it <br /> was thought that the first clay unit represented a possible aquitard, these wells <br /> were constructed to insure that contamination to the groundwater dial not occur <br /> through the creation of a vertical conduit Accordingly, W5, W6, and W7 were <br /> completed as 30-foot monitoring wells, screened from a depth of 20 feet to the <br /> extent of the well with 2-inch diameter 0 020-inch slotted casing Due to its <br /> potential for use in a pumping system, W3 was constructed with 4-inch diameter <br /> casing and screened similarly to the 2-inch wells Well details are included as <br /> Appendix E in Canonie's report <br /> Two to three soil samples from each boring were transported to an analytical <br /> laboratory and analyzed for TPH, BTEX, and ethylene dibromide Gasoline and <br /> xylenes were indicated at 100 ppm and 2 ppm, respectively, in the sample <br /> collected from W2 at a depth of 5 feet, however, no contaminants were indicated <br /> at a depth of 15 feet Samples collected from W4 at a depths of 5 feet and 10 <br /> feet contained 26 ppm and 290 ppm gasoline, as well as ethylbenzene and xylenes <br /> However, soil samples collected from W3 (installed adjacent to W4) contained only <br /> 0 71 ppm gasoline and trace BTEX constituents at a depth of 14 feet, while no <br />