My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005926
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1434
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545950
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 3:15:50 AM
Creation date
8/6/2020 10:47:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005926
RECORD_ID
PR0545950
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003739
FACILITY_NAME
Colonial Energy CE 40134 (DBA Power Mart)
STREET_NUMBER
1434
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Manteca
Zip
95337
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1434 W Yosemite Ave
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
contaminants were found at 20 feet None of the other samples contained <br /> detectable concentrations of gasoline or BTEX Table 2 in Canonie's report <br /> summarizes analytical results and Appendix E contains laboratory reports <br /> On November 5, the groundwater wells were developed and sampled Prior to <br /> purging, an east-southeasterly gradient was determined by measuring the depth to <br /> groundwater in each well Analyses indicated the presence of 0 55 ppb xylenes <br /> in the sample collected from W3, however, no contaminants were detected in the <br /> remaining wells Table 2 in Canonie's report summarizes analytical results and <br /> Appendix E contains laboratory reports <br /> After the installation of the wells, a vapor extraction pilot test was performed <br /> on W1, W2, and W4 to evaluate the feasibility of in-situ remediation by vapor <br /> extraction The results of the study indicate that soil vapors can be easily <br /> extracted from the existing wells and that this technology appears appropriate <br /> for site remediation <br /> Conclusions <br /> Based on the results of the soil and groundwater investigation, it appears that <br /> further action is warranted at this site Although trace concentrations of <br /> xylenes were present in a groundwater sample collected from W4, the levels <br /> indicated fall far below California's primary drinking water quality standards <br /> (1750 ppb for xylenes) Accordingly, it does not appear that the implementation <br /> of a cleanup system is warranted at this time Several quarters of groundwater <br /> monitoring may be appropriate to evaluate changes in groundwater quality <br /> Based on the results of soil samples collected during the tank removal, the <br /> findings of the soil vapor survey, and analyses performed during the site <br /> assessment, it appears that the extent of soil contamination is well defined and <br /> remains limited to the area of the pump islands The installation of a vapor <br /> extraction system should be adequate to address the small amount of impacted <br /> soil <br /> Upon securing a consultant for the above-mentioned activities , a workplan will <br /> be generated and forwarded for your review If you have any questions regarding <br /> this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (206) 286-4495 If I am <br /> unavailable, Kevin Murphy may be able to answer any questions that you may have <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Anastasia E Duarte <br /> Environmental Toxicologist <br /> cc Ms Beth Thayer <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region <br /> i <br /> aed/mar93/4167 L11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.