Laserfiche WebLink
Site History <br /> Jackpot Food Mart 1434 W Yosemite Ave Manteca, CA <br /> Time Oil Property No 64-167 <br /> Based on the excellent results achieved during the vapor extraction pilot test and the low cost of <br /> installing and operating such a system, other remedial methods Involving excavation were not <br /> considered feasible for soil cleanup Vapor extraction is the least expensive option, it can achieve rapid <br /> results, and it will not disrupt the business currently in operation <br /> Selection of Remedial Technology <br /> Vapor extraction Is the proposed remedial technology to achieve cleanup of hydrocarbon-impacted soils <br /> beneath the subject site We estimate that 3 existing wells (W-1, W-2, and W-4) will be used for the <br /> proposed vapor extraction system In addition, horizontal wells may be Installed within the vapor <br /> extraction piping trenches to enhance remediation if hydrocarbon-Impacted soils are encountered during <br /> system Installation Although a radius of influence has not yet been calculated forthe existing wells, it is <br /> estimated that they will be sufficient for cleanup of the impacted soils Should additional wells be <br /> required, they will be Installed at a later date The proposed system will initially utilize an Internal <br /> combustion engine for vapor abatement, however, once vapor concentrations have reduced sufficiently, <br /> carbon will be used <br /> Approval of FRP <br /> The Final Remedial Plan underwent public review and comment in October 1994, and was subsequently <br /> approved by the PHS/EHD <br /> Quarterly Groundwater MonitonnA Report - Fourth Quarter 1994 <br /> On October 25, 1994, quarterly groundwater monitoring was conducted Prior to purging, the depth to <br /> groundwater in each well was measured by a representative of SECOR to assist In evaluating changes in <br /> elevation, flow direction, and gradient Groundwater with an easterly flow was encountered at 15 87 to <br /> 17 17 feet below ground surface <br /> Since the previous sampling event, depth to groundwater increased across the site by approximately <br /> 0 25 feet, and flow changed from northeast to east These variations are consistent with those observed <br /> in previous sampling events <br /> None of the samples were found to contain detectable concentrations of hydrocarbons <br /> A copy of SECOR's "Quarterly Monitoring Report, October - December 1994"was forwarded to the <br /> PHSIEHD and CRWQCB on January 25, 1994 <br /> Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report - First Quarter 1995 <br /> On February 9, 1995, samples were collected from each of the monitoring wells at the subject site Prior <br /> to purging, the depth to groundwater in each well was measured by a representative of SECOR to assist <br /> in evaluating changes in elevation, flow direction, and gradient Groundwater was encountered at 13 88 <br /> feet to 15 10 feet below ground surface <br /> Since the previous sampling event, groundwater elevation had increased across the site by <br /> approximately two feet and flow direction had changed from east to northeast The change In flow <br /> direction Is consistent with that observed in previous sampling events and is most likely a result of <br /> seasonal variation The rise in groundwater elevation is probably due to heavy rainfall during the winter <br /> months <br /> Neither gasoline nor its constituents were detected in any of the samples collected <br /> 4 <br />