Laserfiche WebLink
' Mr Michael Collins 2 September 17, 1992 <br /> with clean Imported fill The old tanks were transported by Triangle, Inc. to their <br /> Sacramento, California facility for disposal <br /> Soli samples taken from the excavation had concentrations f <br /> P t afions o total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G) ranging from non-detect (ND) to 460 parts per <br />' million (ppm); concentrations of benzene were all ND; concentrations of toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, and xylenes ranged from ND to 15 ppm; ethylene dibromide (EDB) <br />' concentrations ranged from ND to 0.00065 ppm; and total lead concentrations were <br /> all ND Of the two soil samples collected beneath the pump islands, only one, the <br /> € Pump-2 sample collected at 4.5 feet, had detectable concentrations The TPH-G <br /> concentration was 13,000 ppm and BTEX concentrations were 4.2, 56, 21 , and 160, <br />' respectively. <br /> Soil Va or Survey <br /> The soil vapor survey was conducted on August 27, 1992 Prior to the start of the <br /> survey, the site was checked for underground utilities by Cruz Brothers Sub-surface <br /> Locators. Any survey points falling in the path of an underground utility was moved <br /> to the nearest safe location. <br /> The soil vapor surveywas conducted b Environmental Control Associates and <br /> Y <br />-� supervised by a Canonie site engineer. The probes were inserted using a hydraulic <br /> ram and advanced to the depths of 9 and 15 feet. Samples were taken using a <br /> charcoal tube connected to a constant flow sampling pump. A known volume of air <br /> was pumped through the tube. The tube was then capped and labeled with the site <br /> name, sample identification, depth, and time. The sample tubes were then submitted <br /> to the mobile laboratory, extracted with methanol, and analyzed for TPH-G with a gas <br /> I chromatograph/flame ionization detector (GC/FID). The reporting limit for TPH-G was <br /> 500 parts per billion volumetrically (PPBv) Following the removal of the soil-vapor <br /> r probe the hole was backfill with neat cement grout. <br /> Results of Soil Vapor Survey <br /> A total of 9 soil vapor survey points were sampled at two depths each The locations <br /> are shown in Figure 3 Based on the results, one soil vapor point (SG-7) was moved <br /> F from its original location and an additional point (SG-9) was sampled Six samples <br /> showed detectable concentrations of TPH-G. SG-1 at 9 feet at 25,000 PPBv; SG-2 <br /> at 9 and 15 feet at 11 ,000 and 1,700 PPBv respectively; SG-4 at 15 feet at 26,000 <br /> PPBv, SG-5 at 9 feet at 9,000 PPBv; and SG-6 at 15 feet at 600 PPBv A summary <br /> of soil vapor survey results are shown in Table 2 The analytical results are contained <br /> in Appendix A <br /> These results indicate that the largest potential source probably is the northern pump <br /> island area <br /> Canon e�r v i r on menta l <br /> pL1W191 8341reportslco1lms2 rpt (September 17 19921 <br />