My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2072
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505553
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 2:16:35 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 12:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2004-2019
RECORD_ID
PR0505553
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0006856
FACILITY_NAME
FRANKS FOOD MART
STREET_NUMBER
2072
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
94336
APN
22202001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2072 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Frank Guinta <br /> Guinta Enterprises <br /> 305 N. Union Road <br /> Manteca, CA 95336 <br /> July 16, 2012 <br /> James Barton, Engineering Geologist, <br /> CRWQCB - Sacramento <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive, Ste. 200 <br /> Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114 <br /> Re: Barton Response Letter dated June 26, 2012 <br /> Mr. Barton, <br /> On the alternatives being considered for the offsite investigation, you misrepresented the Aqua <br /> Science Engineers (ASE) proposal as, ' the investigation you originally proposed". I am attaching <br /> the November 5, 2004 letter from ASE's Senior Geologist, Robert Kitay with their proposal to <br /> modify the County's work plan under their execution. It includes the following, and I quote: <br /> Regarding the off-site assessment to the north, it is our understanding that a water-line is <br /> to be installed up Airport Blvd during the next 12 to 16 months. The availability of city <br /> water to all of the residence that are or could be impacted downgradient of the site should <br /> make the investigation to the north of less importance. Since (a) MTBE concentrations in <br /> the most impacted domestic wells have been decreasing, (b) wellhead treatment systems <br /> are already in-place and being maintained in all impacted residences, (c) a water-line will <br /> soon be installed making further use of domestic wells unnecessary, (d) the MTBE <br /> concentrations detected off-site are too low to allow for effective remediation, and (e) the <br /> funds to complete an off-site investigation to the north are simply not available, the <br /> investigation off-site to the north does not appear to be practical or necessary. ASE <br /> requests that the directive for this off-site investigation be reconsidered. <br /> ASE will also make a recommendation to modify the quarterly monitoring program in the <br /> next quarterly monitoring report. <br /> After over $1.5 million dollars had been spent, they concluded that the off-site investigation was <br /> neither, "practical or necessary". Earlier in 2004, Jerry Sassy told me that many of the wells on <br /> Airport Way could have gone to annual monitoring, some semi-annually, and the ones with <br /> MTBE above the legal limit should be monitored quarterly. As I have stated in previous letters, <br /> lot #495 contamination had nothing to do with my unauthorized release and is an example of <br /> charging work to me that never should have been. Hooking up the affected residences to the city <br /> water when available, as ASE recommended in 2004 and as I reminded you of four or five years <br /> ago, is still what would be in the best interests of the residents. With almost $800K spent for <br /> the offsite monitoring and filtration on Airport way, (between my initial funds and the EAR funds <br /> after the state fund ran out), the residents are no better off but the contractors sure are. This <br /> goes back to my assertion that there has been a tremendous amount of waste and abuse of the <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.