Laserfiche WebLink
C. LEACHLINE SIZING CALCULATIONS <br /> Taking the example used above for the 2,000 gallon septic tank and using the 770 gallons ADF <br /> for the entire winery facility, the following calculations apply to the 4 - 100 ft LL: <br /> Base Tank Capacity(BTC)= 1,200 gal. Leachline Equivalent Requirement= <br /> 1,200 gallons BTC+770 ADF x 0.200 Soil Factor(Sandy Loam SF)=394 lineal feet of leachline <br /> (LFLL)required. Four hundred LFLL were installed. <br /> Taking an application rate of 0.7 gallons/sf/day based upon the average of the two perc tests <br /> correlated with the soil-effluent surface area of 4 sf/ft of LL, we find: <br /> 4 sf x(4x100 ft LL=400)= 1,600 sf soil-effluent surface area. <br /> 1,600 sf x 0.7 gallons/sf/day= 1,120-gallons/day. Therefore, based on the premise that these 4 - <br /> 100 ft leachlines can manage the calculated 770 gallons ADF of wastewater for the entire winery, <br /> all other leachlines can be considered sufficiently sized. <br /> V. CONCLUSIONS <br /> NLS§ 4.1. The nitrate loading calculations show the effluent from the winery facility exclusively <br /> will theoretically possess a nitrate-nitrogen concentration of 1.70 mg/L NO3-N,well below the <br /> Federal nitrate Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 10 ppm NO3-N. Although the entire <br /> winery property totals 89.18 acres,this acreage was reduced to only take into consideration the <br /> 48.4 acres of the actual winery facility. Consequently,the contribution of nitrogen from human <br /> wastewater generation distributed over this acreage significantly lowers the concentration <br /> contribution. <br /> Nitrate loading emanating from the single family residential structure at the north end of the <br /> winery was not factored into the total nitrogen loading from the actual facility because it is evident <br /> that nitrogen contributions from this structure would be a minuscule contribution to the subject <br /> winery area of 48.4 acres. <br /> All winery process wastewater, laboratory originated wastewater, and facility stormwater all flows <br /> into three lined holding ponds. This water is managed by the engineering firm of Kennedy/Jenks <br /> under Waste Discharge Requirements(WDR)promulgated by the Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board. After pre-treatment by the ponds,the water is discharged to fields with a grass- <br /> type crop, south of the lined ponds. <br /> The nitrogen septic tank effluent analytical test results were determined to be exceedingly high <br /> and unrealistic based on an initial analyses by FGL Laboratories. Subsequent analyses of the <br /> same septic tank effluent by A&L Laboratories found the nitrogen concentrations more realistic, <br /> although still higher than what would be expected. It is theorized that due to a low number of <br /> fixtures (toilets and urinals) in the restroom that is used by most of the employees, a fresh water <br /> dilution effect from a greater number of fixtures is not lowering the nitrogen concentration. <br /> Page -10- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />