COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Violation#301-—A response was provided for this violation and the only outstanding item to be addressed was the leaking Graffiti Buster. City Operators originally stated the Graffiti Buster was not actively leaking, which was in my last response, but during our last conversation you indicated the Graffiti Buster was leaking. After meeting with City Operators again, Operators informed me they were mistaken and the ,1 Graffit Buster in fact had leaked onto the shelve and floor. Operators have informed me they tried cleaning all residue from the leak,but it had stained onto the shelving and floor and are unable to remove. There is also an additional blackish stain,which you identified in your photo. However,the City of Lathrop did not have a leak that caused the black stain and the black stain was created by the previous owner of the property. See photo's of gray staining on the shelve and floor. Violation#401–Completed and closed out. Violation #403–As explained in my previous response,the City immediately ensured the container of Graffiti Buster was sealed, and then placed into a secondary container until it was completely used. As explained in violation#301,the City attempted to clean up the staining from the leaking Graffiti Buster, but was unable to remove the stains. After consulting with City Operators again,they informed me in fact they were wrong and the by-lux bright(safety)red did have paint left in the can, and was not closed. The by-lux bright (safety) red had so little paint left in the can it was not usable. Therefore,the can was sealed and discarded in the normal trash. Operators also informed me the paint thinner containers, which had been stored behind the storage shed was empty of hazardous waste, but had accumulated rain water in the can. The rain water was emptied by discharging down the onsite sanitary sewer, and the container was discarded in the normal trash. �rW Violation #404 & 407–Completed and closed out. Violation #601–After consulting with the City again,the City informed me the accumulation date was wrong as it was labeled July, 2016. However,the actual accumulation date should 111 have started Jay-20-12. City Operators dropped off the waste container labeled July, 2016 at a local hazardous waste facility. Attached are photos of the manifest, and the new container with the current accumulation date of August 15, 2016. } Violation#605–You advised me this violation was still open because of violation#403. The container of Graffiti Buster was sealed, and then placed into a secondary container until it was completely used. After its use the empty can of Graffiti Buster was discarded in the normal trash. After consulting with City Operators again,they informed me in fact they were wrong and the by-lux bright(safety) red did have a small amount of paint left in the can. The by-lux bright