Laserfiche WebLink
State of California Department of Health Services <br /> AV <br /> randum PMemo <br /> a <br /> 70 Jim Tj OSVOld 4 S F ^''! Date "ri1 29, 1988 <br /> Senior Waste Management Engineer <br /> Subject:MCCORMICK & BAXTER <br /> SRWCF ASSESSMENT <br /> OCTOBER 1987 AND <br /> JANUARY 1988 <br /> From Jeff Van Slooten <br /> Associate Hazardous Management Specialist <br /> Task 15 of the workplan for "Completion of the Site Assessment <br /> Plan and Pollution Control and Mitigation Plan" , submitted in <br /> July 1987 and approved by the State was to determine the effects <br /> of McCormick and Baxter (M&B) discharge on the SRWCF treatment <br /> operation, sludge, and effluent quality. In October 1987, M&B <br /> submitted an interim report which contains chemical data from <br /> June 1985 through August 1987 . Included in the report was <br /> several recommendations regarding sample control for chlorinated <br /> phenols. The January 1988 report contains additional chemical <br /> data from M&B wastewater and SRWCF. <br /> The data analysis begins by stating that polynuclear aromatic <br /> hydrocarbons, (PAH) and metals from M&B process have no <br /> measurable effect on SRWCF. Data presented on PAH or metals <br /> discharged by M&B and SRWCF influent, effluent, and sludge was <br /> used to conclude this fact. <br /> SRWCF has pretreatment standards set by the EPA on September 28, <br /> 1982 . These are: <br /> Table 1 - Pretreatment Standards <br /> Chemical Concentration (mg/1) <br /> Oil and grease 100 <br /> Copper 5 <br /> Chromium 4 <br /> Arsenic 4 <br /> The only two metal analyses on storm water presented by M&B <br /> (October 1987) for metals showed levels above pretreatment <br /> standards (Table 2) . A telephone conversation with SRWCF <br /> Environmental Control disclosed that one of the samples collected <br /> from the plant process discharge line was also above pretreatment <br /> standards. While M&B discharge <br /> In Lne uczeL)ei lyo / <br /> is effective in treating pentachlorophenol waste. <br /> During the past three years, data has not been collected to <br /> determine the mass balance of pentachlorophenol from M&B to final <br /> effluent from SRWCF. A mass balance at SRWCF would be required <br /> to ensure that the treatment plant can adequately handle the <br /> waste. While M&B has modified their process to reduce waste <br /> discharged, pentachlorophenol concentrations after the initial <br /> drop have been increasing during 1987 . In addition, no decrease <br /> in the SRWCF influent concentration was seen during the canning <br /> season (July 15 through October 15) when the volume doubles. <br /> -2- <br />