Laserfiche WebLink
Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br /> Environmental impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials would be less than those <br /> of the proposed Project. Cumulative vector impacts associated with biosolids disposal would be <br /> avoided. Potential health and safety hazards associated with the transport and disposal of the <br /> three eliminated waste streams — dust inhalation and pathogen exposure —would be eliminated. <br /> Potential environmental impacts associated with known and presently unknown oil, gas and <br /> injection wells would be similar. <br /> Hydrology and Water Quality <br /> Environmental impacts associated with hydrology and water quality would be less than for the <br /> Project. Leachate generation would not occur. <br /> Transportation and Traffic <br /> Environmental impacts associated with transportation and traffic would be similar to those for the <br /> Project. The same daily 2,000 tons tonnage restriction would apply to both scenarios; the <br /> location of potential major waste stream generators such as biosolids and treated auto shredder <br /> waste are similar, as are the access routes (I-5, S.R. 46, Holloway Road) which will be used by <br /> essentially all waste transport vehicles under either the Project or this Alternative. <br /> Public Services <br /> Mitigations have been included that reduce any impacts to public services for diversion goals of <br /> the County and impacts to County landfills. <br /> This alternative, with the deletion of biosolids, would have only a short term impact from <br /> transportation and operations for greenhouse gases as no landfill gas, or only a very low quantity <br /> thereof, would be generated. It would also reduce the VOC's produced and negate the <br /> requirement for landfill gas monitoring. This alternative would not generate vectors and thus not <br /> produce a cumulative impact of hazards (vectors). However, it would not meet all of the Project <br /> objectives as it would not take advantage of the geologic and hydrogeologic conditions at the <br /> Project site which provide unique advantages and safeguards for the environmentally beneficial <br /> disposal of the waste streams, including biosolids. <br /> In accordance with CEQA Guideline 15091, the Kern County Board of Supervisors thus finds <br /> that this alternative cannot feasibly obtain the objectives of the Project, even though it would <br /> reduce or avoid some of the significant impacts of the Project. Therefore, this alternative is less <br /> desirable than the proposed Project and rejects this alternative. <br /> Alternative C: Reduced Capacity Alternative <br /> Under this alternative, the Project would be authorized under a Solid Waste Facility Permit but there <br /> would be a reduction of approximately 2,600,000 cubic yards in the capacity of the facility(refer to Table <br /> 3.3-1 Project Summary). The designated permit area for disposal would not include the Pit "F/G <br /> Connection Area" and the Project's capacity would be correspondingly reduced. All proposed waste <br /> streams would remain the same. <br /> Impacts <br /> Findings of Fact—Section 15091 March 15,2016 <br /> H. M. Holloway Landfill Modification Project Final Board of Supervisors <br /> 51 <br />