My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2526
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0514248
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2020 5:20:11 PM
Creation date
9/22/2020 4:37:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0514248
PE
2294
FACILITY_ID
FA0010245
FACILITY_NAME
DTE STOCKTON LLC
STREET_NUMBER
2526
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2526 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Effects Of The Project That Cannot Be AUtigated To A Level Less Than <br /> Significant. <br /> Potential Significant Effect <br /> Without appropriate mitigation, the project has the potential to impact air quality due to emissions of <br /> ozone precursors(NOx.VOC)from project operation of onroad material transport. <br /> Description of Specific Impact <br /> The Project specific emission increase from transport of biosolids was determined by difference between <br /> actual emissions attributed to transport of material during the baseline period and the 2,000 tpd case <br /> predicted emissions from transport of up to 2,000 tpd of material(biosolids or a combination of biosolids <br /> and other permitted materials). <br /> 2,000 TPD Case(Onroad Transport) <br /> Exhaust emissions result from onroad mobile source equipment used to transport waste (heavy-heavy <br /> duty diesel trucks)were determined using URBEMIS 2002. The land use category used in the modeling <br /> was"General Heavy Industry"and the Project location type was specified as"rural." <br /> Emissions from material transport were modeled using a fleet consisting of'heavy-heavy duty diesel <br /> fueled trucks. The trip count used,in the URBEMIS modeling runs was determined by doubling the loads <br /> per day of waste,calculated by dividing tons per day of material by 22 tons per truck load. <br /> 2,000 tpd case transport emissions were calculated from the number of truck loads (trips) required to <br /> transport 2,000 tons per day of material and the weighted average distance to likely biosolids generators <br /> located within California. 2,000 tpd case predicted emissions were calculated using a daily rate equal to <br /> 182 vehicle trip ends per day.(91 truck loads of waste per day). <br /> Travel to the facility is typically via Interstate Highway 5 and-State Route 46. Consequently, emissions <br /> from transport of material were modeled using an average speed equal to 55 miles'per hour. <br /> The location of likely biosolids generators were obtained from an EPA database listing California <br /> facilities with active national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES). permits that have a two <br /> digit standard industrial classification(SIC) equal to 49. For facilities with missing or obviously incorrect <br /> locations, the longitude and latitude of the centroid of the 9-digit zip code area was used. For facilities <br /> located outside of the San Joaquin Valley, the facility was associated with the nearest travel point <br /> providing access to the San Joaquin Valley. <br /> Likely transport routes were generated by assuming that the biosolids would be transported over major <br /> roads and highways. The most likely travel route from a given facility to the Lost Hills Disposal Facility <br /> was determined using a simple "travel cost surface,"where "travel cost"was assumed proportional to the <br /> type of roadway system. For example it "cost more" to travel on a surface road than to travel on a two <br /> lane highway and it "cost more" to travel on a highway than to travel on a freeway. ("travel cost" _ <br /> desirability in terms of time, safety, speed, convenience, etc.). <br /> The travel distance was weighted by assuming that loads of material received from a given facility (or <br /> access point for facilities outside of the valley),would be: 1) directly proportional to the amount of <br /> ------ --- - - ------- <br /> Findings of Fact—Section 15091 March 15,2016 <br /> H.M.Holloway Landfill Modification Project Final Board of Supervisors <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.