Laserfiche WebLink
A I.T1 i <br /> Roy F.Weston,Inc. <br /> Suite 100 <br /> 6400 Canoga Avenue C`'; 2� PH 2: 4 <br /> Woodland Hills,California 91367-�42 <br /> DESIGNERS/CONSULTANTS <br /> MANAGERS <br /> M 818-596-6900-Fax 818-596-6970 <br /> 20 December 1993 <br /> Mr. Chandler Martin <br /> Associate Planner <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Community Development Department <br /> 1810 E. Hazelton Ave. <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Re: Site Approval Application No. SA-93-41 <br /> Dear Mr. Martin: <br /> Roy F. Weston, Inc. (WESTON), on behalf of O.M. Scotts & Sons Company (Scotts) is <br /> following up on our letter to appeal the Conditions of Approval dated 8 December 1993. <br /> We understand that the appeal check of $275 will be returned to WESTON when the <br /> Conditions being appealed have been resolved with the respective departments. The <br /> purpose of this letter is to indicate, by each reviewing department, the resolution of the <br /> Condition or the understanding and plan of action that will be taken concerning the <br /> Conditions that were appealed in our 8 December correspondence. In most instances, <br /> Scotts had simply requested an extension of the time to review the Conditions of Approval <br /> to further investigate the issues or ordinances indicated. <br /> Community Development Department <br /> Conditions c. and d.: <br /> Scotts will pave the length of the access road to the composting facility but "interior roads" <br /> will remain unpaved. The composting area will also remain unpaved but meet the state and <br /> local requirements for dust suppression. Based on conversations with Community <br /> Development Staff, we understand that this is acceptable. These issues were further <br /> clarified in our letter of 14 December 1993 and confirmed 15 December. <br /> Department of Public Works <br /> Scotts had requested to hold open the appeal process for an additional two weeks while <br /> these issues and Development Title Sections were further investigated. Scotts now <br /> withdraws the appeal based on the current understanding of these issues being as follows: <br /> • Condition 2 - Scotts has chosen not to add another entrance from Flood road. <br /> Therefore, this condition would apply to the existing entrance. Based on <br />