My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0082950
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUGAR
>
9375
>
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
>
SR0082950
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/24/2020 2:50:30 PM
Creation date
12/3/2020 2:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
RECORD_ID
SR0082950
PE
4201
STREET_NUMBER
9375
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SUGAR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
21216017
ENTERED_DATE
12/2/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9375 N SUGAR RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\fgarciaruiz
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
principles of Hantzsche-Finnemore Equation are still valid,but a rearrangement of terms and <br /> calculations is needed to more reasonably estimate the resultant nitrate-nitrogen percolation <br /> value. I recommend revising the analysis per the methodology outlined in Attachment 1. <br /> 2. Other Comments. Other comments that may or not be pertinent following recommended <br /> adjustment the methodology(Comment 1) are: <br /> a. Wastewater Flow. On page 7,the wastewater flow projection used for the analysis is <br /> stated as 600 gpd.This does not agree with the information from Siegfried,which <br /> estimates the wastewater flow to be 960 gpd. <br /> b. Precipitation Data(Table 4). The values for monthly precipitation values for the Tracy <br /> area in Table 4 (page 6) are labeled"2 years in 10"data from the Soil Survey of San <br /> Joaquin County. They are stated to be"conservative"(i.e.,lower)as compared with <br /> average precipitation amounts;but they are actually significantly higher than average <br /> monthly precipitation amounts for Tracy. The total of the individual monthly amounts <br /> equals 19.54 inches,well above the annual average precipitation for Tracy (10 to 11 <br /> inches). The total given at the bottom of Table 4 is correctly copied from the source <br /> document(Soil Survey), but I believe it represents the"2 in 10 years"annual total,which <br /> is different from the total of the individual monthly values list. The average monthly <br /> precipitation values should be used in the nitrate loading analysis instead of the"2 in 10 <br /> years"values listed in Table 4. <br /> c. Annual Rainfall-Recharge Value.In Table 4 the estimated value for rainfall-recharge <br /> ("deep percolation")is given as 2.21 inches per year. However, in the calculations that <br /> follow(bottom of page 8), a value of 9.5 inches per year is inserted for R,without any <br /> rationale or reference. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.