Laserfiche WebLink
PotentiallyLess Than Less Than <br /> Significant Significant with Significant No <br /> g Mitigation g <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> VII. Geology And Soils. <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial <br /> adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or F-1 [I [Ideath involving: <br /> i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as <br /> delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo <br /> Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the <br /> State Geologist for the area or based on other ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br /> Division of Mines and Geology Special <br /> Publication 42. <br /> ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ FX-1 ❑ <br /> iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> liquefaction? X <br /> iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> topsoil? X <br /> c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, <br /> or that would become unstable as a result of the <br /> project, and potentially result in on- or off-site F-1 1:11:1landslide,lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction <br /> or collapse? <br /> d) Be located on expansive soil and create direct or ❑ ❑ 1-1indirect risks to life or property? X <br /> e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the <br /> useof septic tanks or alternative waste water ❑ ❑ 1 1-1disp osal s stems where sewers are not available for <br /> the disposal of waste water? <br /> f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br /> paleontological resource or site or unique geologic ❑ 1111feature? <br /> Impact Discussion: <br /> a-i) No Impact. The Alquist—Priolo Earthquake Zoning Act(Alquist—Priolo Act) requires the delineation of fault zones <br /> along active faults in California. The purpose of the Alquist—Priolo Act is to regulate development on or near active <br /> fault traces to reduce hazards associated with fault rupture. Alquist—Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones are the regulatory <br /> zones that include surface traces of active faults. <br /> According to the California Department of Conservation, the nearest active Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone to the Project site <br /> is the Greenville Fault Zone, located approximately 9.8 miles southwest of the project site (DOC 2020). In addition, <br /> the Great Valley 7 Fault, considered an active fault by the state, is located approximately 4.4 miles south of the project <br /> site (CEG 2020). However, no faults are located below the project site. As such, the potential for surface rupture of an <br /> Alquist—Priolo Earthquake Fault on the Project site is very low. Therefore, no impacts associated fault rupture would <br /> occur, and this issue will not be evaluated further in the Draft EIR. <br /> Enter oroiect#s. —Initial Study 15 <br />