My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0082985_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SCHULTE
>
14800
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0082985_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:04:15 AM
Creation date
12/21/2020 3:02:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0082985
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
14800
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SCHULTE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20924023
ENTERED_DATE
12/8/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
14800 W SCHULTE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.5 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 <br />14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 4.5-21 <br />Best Performance Standards. The SJVAPCD evaluated performance-based standards that would state “in <br />quantifiable terms the level and extent of the attribute necessary to reach a goal or objective ” (SJVAPCD 2009a). <br />The SJVAPCD considered a project achieving the performance-based standard or mitigating GHG emissions to an <br />equivalent emissions reduction level would be considered to have a less-than-significant cumulative impact on <br />climate change. In conclusion, the SJVAPCD found that the state’s GHG emission s reduction target would be <br />accomplished by achieving a 29% reduction from business-as-usual (BAU), and that achieving this reduction would <br />be a “de facto” performance-based standard for GHG emissions reductions. <br />On December 17, 2009, the SJVAPCD Governing Board adopted Guidance for Valley Land-Use Agencies in <br />Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects under CEQA (SJVAPCD 2009b). The guidance recommends the <br />following hierarchy for evaluating a project’s impact with respect to its GHG emissions: <br />• Projects complying with an approved GHG emission reduction plan or GHG mitigation program that avoids <br />or substantially reduces GHG emissions within the geographic area in which the Project is located would <br />be determined to have a less-than-significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. Such <br />plans or programs must be specified in law or approved by the lead agency with jurisdiction over the <br />affected resource and supported by a CEQA compliant environmental review document adopted by the lead <br />agency. Projects complying with an approved GHG emission reduction plan or GHG mitigation program <br />would not be required to implement BPS. <br />• Projects implementing BPSs would not require quantification of project-specific GHG emissions.5 <br />Consistent with the CEQA Guidelines, such projects would be determined to have a less-than-significant <br />individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. <br />• Projects not implementing BPSs would require quantification of project-specific GHG emissions and <br />demonstration that project-specific GHG emissions would be reduced or mitigated by at least 29% <br />compared to BAU, including GHG emission reductions achieved since the 2002–2004 baseline period. <br />Projects achieving at least a 29% GHG emission reduction compared to BAU would be determined to have <br />a less-than-significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG (SJVAPCD 2009b). <br />• For development projects, BPSs would include project design elements, land use decisions, and technologies that <br />reduce GHG emissions. Although the SJVAPCD has adopted BPSs for several types of stationary sources (e.g., <br />boilers), it has not developed BPSs for land development projects. Projects implementing any combination of BPSs <br />and/or demonstrating a total 29% reduction in GHG emissions from BAU would be determined to have a less-than- <br />significant individual and cumulative impact on global climate change (SJVAPCD 2015). <br />County of San Joaquin <br />The County’s General Plan Public Health and Safety Element GHG reductions goals, and Natural and Cultural <br />Resources Element energy resources goals set targets and strategies to reduce GHG emissions and associated <br />climate change by supporting new renewable energy facilities. These are as follows (County of San Joaquin 2016): <br />Goal PHS-6: To reduce GHG emissions as part of the statewide effort to combat climate change. <br />Policy PHS-6.2: Community GHG Reduction Targets. The County shall reduce community GHG <br />emissions by 15% below 2005 levels by 2020, and shall strive to reduce GHG emissions <br />by 40% and 80% below reduced 2020 levels by 2035 and 2050, respectively. <br /> <br />5 The guidance recommends, “projects requiring preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for any other reason would require <br />quantification of project specific GHG emissions” (SJVAPCD 2009c). This assessment for the project does include quantification <br />of the project’s construction and operational GHG emissions.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.