Laserfiche WebLink
4.5 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 <br />14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 4.5-21 <br />Best Performance Standards. The SJVAPCD evaluated performance-based standards that would state “in <br />quantifiable terms the level and extent of the attribute necessary to reach a goal or objective ” (SJVAPCD 2009a). <br />The SJVAPCD considered a project achieving the performance-based standard or mitigating GHG emissions to an <br />equivalent emissions reduction level would be considered to have a less-than-significant cumulative impact on <br />climate change. In conclusion, the SJVAPCD found that the state’s GHG emission s reduction target would be <br />accomplished by achieving a 29% reduction from business-as-usual (BAU), and that achieving this reduction would <br />be a “de facto” performance-based standard for GHG emissions reductions. <br />On December 17, 2009, the SJVAPCD Governing Board adopted Guidance for Valley Land-Use Agencies in <br />Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects under CEQA (SJVAPCD 2009b). The guidance recommends the <br />following hierarchy for evaluating a project’s impact with respect to its GHG emissions: <br />• Projects complying with an approved GHG emission reduction plan or GHG mitigation program that avoids <br />or substantially reduces GHG emissions within the geographic area in which the Project is located would <br />be determined to have a less-than-significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. Such <br />plans or programs must be specified in law or approved by the lead agency with jurisdiction over the <br />affected resource and supported by a CEQA compliant environmental review document adopted by the lead <br />agency. Projects complying with an approved GHG emission reduction plan or GHG mitigation program <br />would not be required to implement BPS. <br />• Projects implementing BPSs would not require quantification of project-specific GHG emissions.5 <br />Consistent with the CEQA Guidelines, such projects would be determined to have a less-than-significant <br />individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. <br />• Projects not implementing BPSs would require quantification of project-specific GHG emissions and <br />demonstration that project-specific GHG emissions would be reduced or mitigated by at least 29% <br />compared to BAU, including GHG emission reductions achieved since the 2002–2004 baseline period. <br />Projects achieving at least a 29% GHG emission reduction compared to BAU would be determined to have <br />a less-than-significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG (SJVAPCD 2009b). <br />• For development projects, BPSs would include project design elements, land use decisions, and technologies that <br />reduce GHG emissions. Although the SJVAPCD has adopted BPSs for several types of stationary sources (e.g., <br />boilers), it has not developed BPSs for land development projects. Projects implementing any combination of BPSs <br />and/or demonstrating a total 29% reduction in GHG emissions from BAU would be determined to have a less-than- <br />significant individual and cumulative impact on global climate change (SJVAPCD 2015). <br />County of San Joaquin <br />The County’s General Plan Public Health and Safety Element GHG reductions goals, and Natural and Cultural <br />Resources Element energy resources goals set targets and strategies to reduce GHG emissions and associated <br />climate change by supporting new renewable energy facilities. These are as follows (County of San Joaquin 2016): <br />Goal PHS-6: To reduce GHG emissions as part of the statewide effort to combat climate change. <br />Policy PHS-6.2: Community GHG Reduction Targets. The County shall reduce community GHG <br />emissions by 15% below 2005 levels by 2020, and shall strive to reduce GHG emissions <br />by 40% and 80% below reduced 2020 levels by 2035 and 2050, respectively. <br /> <br />5 The guidance recommends, “projects requiring preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for any other reason would require <br />quantification of project specific GHG emissions” (SJVAPCD 2009c). This assessment for the project does include quantification <br />of the project’s construction and operational GHG emissions.