My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0082985_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SCHULTE
>
14800
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0082985_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:04:15 AM
Creation date
12/21/2020 3:02:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0082985
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
14800
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SCHULTE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20924023
ENTERED_DATE
12/8/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
14800 W SCHULTE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.7 – Transportation <br />Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 <br />14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 4.7-8 <br />• Regional Retail (>50,000 square feet): Total VMT per service population for trips taken by both workers <br />and visitors. <br />• Mixed-Use: Total VMT per service population. <br />• Other: Total VMT per service population for trips taken by both workers and visitors. <br />The County does not have established VMT thresholds; however, a draft of the County’s VMT Thresholds Study <br />recommends a similar approach to that provided in the OPR Technical Advisory (County of San Joaquin 2020a). <br />OPR recommends a 15% reduction from baseline VMT per capita or per employee for residential and work projects, <br />respectively (OPR 2018). The Project is a warehousing land use and therefore is an employment project. Therefore, <br />home-based work (HBW) VMT per employee metric was used in the assessment of VMT impacts. <br />The San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) Regional Travel Demand Model (RTDM) was updated in <br />December 2019, with a base year of 2015 and a forecast year of 2045. HBW vehicular trips were selected for <br />evaluation in the County’s VMT Threshold Study to estimate trips associated with work VMT and estimate an average <br />HBW VMT per employee (County of San Joaquin 2020a). The VMT Thresholds Study recommends 16.19 VMT per <br />employee as a threshold for VMT impacts, 15% below the County’s average HBW VMT per employee. <br />Although the VMT trips evaluated in the SJCOG RTDM would not be expected to change because baseline model <br />data is static, the California Statewide Travel Demand Model (CSTDM) was also used in this analysis because the <br />County’s VMT Threshold Study has not yet been adopted. The CSTDM is a statewide model; therefore, it contains <br />larger traffic analysis zones (TAZs) compared to regional models and provides a high-level VMT analysis. The CSTDM <br />has a base year of 2010, with a forecast year of 2040. Based on data provided in the CSTDM for San Joaquin <br />County, 15% below the County average home-based work VMT per employee is 12.27. <br />The Project would be considered to have a significant impact if the Project VMT per employee is greater than 16.19 per <br />the SJCOG RTDM, and 12.27 per the CSTDM. Table 4.7-1 summarizes VMT per-employee thresholds from both models. <br />Table 4.7-1. VMT Threshold Summary <br /> <br />SJCOG RTDM1 CSTDM2 <br />VMT per Employee <br />Regional Average (San Joaquin County) 19.05 14.43 <br />15% below San Joaquin County 16.19 12.27 <br />Notes: <br />VMT = vehicle miles traveled; SJCOG = San Joaquin Council of Governments; RTDM = Regional Travel Demand Model; CSDTM = <br />California State Transportation Demand Model. <br />1 Figure A.7 of the Draft County of San Joaquin VMT Thresholds Study (County of San Joaquin 2020a) <br />2 CSTDM TAZ excel spreadsheet (Caltrans 2015) <br />The Project’s VMT analysis is provided under Threshold B. <br />Hazardous Features (Project Access) <br />The analysis evaluates whether the Project would result in hazards due to design features by determining <br />appropriate acceleration and deceleration lane lengths, analyzing proximity of Project driveways to other driveways, <br />driveway throat depths, and truck access. A significant impact would occur if truck traffic would not be able to <br />navigate the site due to insufficient driveway widths or curb radii, locations of Project driveways would interfere with <br />nearby driveways, or if vehicle queueing would impact on- or off-site vehicle operations.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.