My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0082985_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SCHULTE
>
14800
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0082985_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:04:15 AM
Creation date
12/21/2020 3:02:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0082985
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
14800
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SCHULTE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20924023
ENTERED_DATE
12/8/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
14800 W SCHULTE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.7 – Transportation <br />Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 <br />14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 4.7-14 <br />Additionally, per the December 15, 2020, memorandum, the County will require the Project applicant to modify the <br />site plan to meet City driveways standards in one of the two following ways: <br />• Move western driveway approximately 160 feet to the east to provide the minimum recommended distance <br />of 500 feet from the 14900 Schulte Road driveway if full access is to be maintained, or <br />• If the western driveway remains less than 500 feet from the 14900 Schulte Road driveway, driveway will <br />be restricted to right-in/right-out access only. <br />Per the County’s requirements, with implementation of MM-TRAF-1, the Project would not incorporate design <br />features that would increase hazards, and impacts associated with site access would be less than significant. <br />Incompatible Uses <br />The Project site is located within an agricultural area that is transitioning to one that is primarily industrial, and farm <br />equipment may operate on Project-area roadways. However, although farm equipment may operate on these <br />roadways, the Project’s traffic would use designated truck routes and operate in other industrial areas. Additionally, <br />operators of farm equipment would be required to comply with regulations and equipment restrictions of the <br />roadways. Therefore, the Project would not increase hazards due to the introduction of a use that is incompatible <br />with existing uses, and impacts would be less than significant. <br />Overall, with implementation of MM -TRAF -1, the Project would result in less -than-significant impacts related <br />to Threshold C. <br />Threshold D: Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? <br />Less-Than-Significant Impact. Site access would be provided via two driveways on Schulte Road and a 25-foot-wide <br />driveway on Quality Drive. Emergency vehicle access would be available at both driveways and facilitated within the <br />entirety of the Project site. Additionally, a 25-foot-wide driveway on Quality Drive would be reserved exclusively for <br />emergency access. The Project site would be accessible to emergency responders during construction and <br />operation of the Project. All emergency access roads would be constructed in compliance with Section 503.1 of the <br />California Fire Code and the San Joaquin County Fire Chiefs Association’s Fire Access Road Standards. Therefore, <br />impacts associated with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would be less than significant. <br />Threshold E: Would the Project result in cumulatively considerable transportation impacts? <br />Less-Than-Significant Impact. Per the OPR Technical Advisory , “a project that falls below an efficiency -based <br />threshold that is aligned with long -term environmental goals and relevant plans would have no cumulative <br />impact distinct from the project impact. Accordingly, a finding of a less -than-significant project impact would <br />imply a less than significant cumulative impact, and vice versa” (OPR 2018). Based on the VMT analysis <br />provided under Threshold B , because the Project would be screened out from further VMT analysis based on <br />its location in a low VMT -generating TAZ, it would have a less-than-significant cumulative impact to VMT and <br />would not result in cumulatively considera ble transportation impacts.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.