SR0082985_SSNL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4.7 – Transportation Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 4.7-15 4.7.5 Mitigation Measures MM-TRAF-1 The Project would require one of the two following improvements to mitigate impacts to site access, consistent with County of San Joaquin requirements to adhere to City of Tracy driveway standards: • Move western driveway approximately 160 feet to the east to provide the minimum recommended distance of 500 feet from the 14900 Schulte Road driveway if full access is to be maintained, or • If the western driveway remains less than 500 feet from the 14900 Schulte Road driveway, driveway will be restricted to right-in/right-out access only. 4.7.6 Level of Significance After Mitigation Threshold A: Would the Project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? The Project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities, and its impact to transportation plans and programs would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Threshold B: Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? The Project would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b), and its impact to VMT would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Threshold C: Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? The Project would include MM-TRAF-1 to facilitate on-site circulation and site access for passenger vehicles and trucks, and to ensure efficient off-site circulation on nearby roadway facilities. With this mitigation measure, the Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses, and impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Threshold D: Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? The Project would be accessible to emergency responders during construction and operation of the Project. Therefore, impacts associated with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Threshold E: Would the Project result in cumulatively considerable transportation impacts? The Project would be screened out from further VMT analysis based on its location in a low VMT-generating TAZ per Threshold B. Therefore, given that a finding of a less-than-significant Project impact would imply a less-than- significant cumulative impact for VMT, the Project would have a less-than-significant cumulative impact with regard to VMT and would not result in cumulatively considerable transportation impacts. No mitigation is required.