Laserfiche WebLink
4.8 – Water <br />Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 <br />14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 4.8-9 <br />Additionally, the Project would involve the development of three infiltration basins and a septic tank/leech field <br />system. The infiltration would allow for stormwater runoff collected on the Project to infiltrate into soils and recharge <br />the underlying aquifer. Similarly, the septic tank and leech field system would allow for a portion of the Project’s <br />water use to be returned to the underlying aquifer. Given that the Project would not substantially decrease <br />groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge, the Project would not impede sustainable <br />groundwater management of the basin. Impacts would be less than significant. <br />Threshold C: Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or <br />sustainable groundwater management plan? <br />Less-than-Significant Impact. The Project would comply with applicable water quality regulatory requirements, <br />including implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program, stormwater BMPs, and Low Impact <br />Development design, which would minimize potential off-site surface water quality impacts. <br />With respect to groundwater management, the Project would comply with applicable water quality regulatory <br />requirements, including implementation of a SWPPP, stormwater BMPs, and LID design, which would minimize <br />potential off-site surface water quality impacts and contribute to a reduction in water quality impacts within the <br />overall watershed. In addition, with compliance with these regulatory requirements, the Project would reduce <br />potential water quality impairment of surface waters such that existing and potential beneficial uses of key surface <br />water drainages throughout the watershed. <br />With respect to groundwater management, the Project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or <br />interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. The Project would be within the jurisdiction of the County of San <br />Joaquin GSA, which is in the process of developing a GSP with the other GSAs within the Tracy Subbasin. The Tracy <br />Subbasin GSP is currently being drafted and is expected to be adopted prior to January 31, 2022. The GSP is <br />expected to identify a water budget for the Tracy Subbasin, goals to achieve sustainability of the Tracy Subbasin’s <br />groundwater resources, and projects and actions to continue the reliability of the region’s groundwater supplies. <br />The GSP is not anticipated to result in site-specific water use restrictions that the Project could conflict with. On the <br />contrary, the GSP is expected to develop and implement projects that would increase recharge of the Tracy <br />Subbasin. Given that these are collaborative planning efforts that would occur at the agency level, the Project would <br />not interfere with the future GSP, Impacts would be less than significant. <br />Threshold D: Would the Project result in cumulatively considerable impacts relating to water or groundwater? <br />Less-than-Significant Impact. The Project would involve the use of groundwater supplies that would be sourced <br />from on-site water wells. A Water Source Assessment was prepared to evaluate the reliability and availability of the <br />Project’s water supplies and determined that existing groundwater conditions are sufficient to supply the demands <br />for the Project even during multiple dry years. San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division has confirmed <br />these findings, as part of their duties to ensure that water quality and quantity are adequate to meet the needs of <br />cumulative development. <br />In addition, the Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater <br />recharge or interfere with sustainable groundwater management of the Tracy Subbasin. On the contrary, the GSP <br />is expected to develop and implement projects that would increase recharge of the Tracy Subbasin, negating <br />possible effects of cumulative development on groundwater supplies. Further, the Project would involve the <br />development of three infiltration basins and a septic tank/leech field system. The infiltration would allow for <br />stormwater runoff collected on the Project to infiltrate into soils and recharge the underlying aquifer. Similarly, the