Laserfiche WebLink
• Page 3 <br /> Brusca File No. 137-002 February 12,2018 <br /> Murphy Parkway Property Soil Gas Monitoring Wells <br /> outside the limits of planned pavements for the upcoming development at the site (so that the <br /> wells would not be disturbed during construction). <br /> The two soil gas monitoring wells SGMW1 and SGMW2 were installed at the site on January <br /> 16, 2018 by a C57-licensed contractor. Drilling and well installation operations were performed <br /> under the direct supervision of a Professional Geologist from our office and with oversight by a <br /> representative from the SJCEHD. The monitoring wells were constructed within approximate <br /> eight-inch diameter borings drilled with a track-mounted drill rig using hollow-stem augers. <br /> The boring for SGMW1 encountered relatively uniform native alluvial deposits comprised of <br /> silty fine sands at the surface and extending to the total boring depth of 13 feet (see Plate 4). No <br /> visual or olfactory evidence of chemical contamination conditions was observed in the soils <br /> encountered in the boring. Additionally, no fill or waste materials were encountered in this <br /> boring. Groundwater was encountered in this boring at the termination depth of 13 feet. Per the <br /> request of the SJCEHD and the provisions of the referenced Workplan Addendum, the soil gas <br /> well was installed to a depth of 12 feet within this borehole (about one foot above the <br /> groundwater level). <br /> Based on the groundwater depth observed in the SGMW1 boring, and recognizing that the <br /> ground surface elevation at the SGMW2 location is about two feet lower than at the SGMW1 <br /> location, it was decided to advance the boring for SGMW2 to a total depth of 10 feet, and install <br /> the soil gas well at this location to that depth (so that the bottom of the well would be about one <br /> foot above the groundwater level). The boring for SGMW2 encountered relatively uniform fill <br /> soils comprised of silty fine sands at the surface and extending to the total boring depth (see <br /> Plate 5). The fill materials encountered in SGMW2 are considered to be backfill materials <br /> placed in this area following excavation and removal of wastes from this area (South Waste Cell) <br /> in 2015. No visual or olfactory evidence of chemical contamination conditions was observed in <br /> the soils encountered in the boring for SGMW2. Additionally, neither waste materials nor <br /> groundwater were encountered in this boring. <br /> Following drilling, two-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC casing was used to construct the soil gas <br /> monitoring wells within the boreholes. For SGMW1 the casing was screened (0.020-inch slots) <br /> from a depth of five feet to 12 feet, and for SGMW2 the casing was screened from three feet to 10 <br /> feet. The upper portions of the casings are solid and extend above the ground surface. The annular <br /> space surrounding the screened portion of the wells and extending one foot above was backfilled <br /> with washed graded silica sand. An approximate one-foot-thick bentonite plug was placed and <br /> hydrated within the annular space directly above the sand filter in each well. The remaining <br /> annular space above was grouted with neat-cement to the ground surface. A soil gas sampling <br /> port was installed at the upper end of each well casing and the portions of the well casings above <br /> the ground surface were protected with locking steel risers/monuments. The configurations of <br /> the soil gas monitoring wells are shown on Plates 4 and 5. <br /> ABANDONMENT OF SOIL GAS MONITORING WELL VP-1 <br /> As a part of site investigative work performed in 2015, Advanced GeoEnvironmental installed a <br /> soil gas monitoring well identified as VP-1 on the property (see Plate 2). Past sampling of this <br /> well reportedly has not revealed methane or VOCs in soil gas at levels that would be a concern; <br />