My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1990 - 1992
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1990 - 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2024 2:28:57 PM
Creation date
2/2/2021 2:07:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1990 - 1992
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Has there been a change in operator? <br />part of the project description. <br />E <br />If so, this should also be <br />Will acceptance of additional wastes result in a vertical <br />expansion of this facility? If so, this should be addressed in <br />the project description, and potential impacts and mitigations <br />should be thoroughly discussed in the environmental document. <br />Where is the additional waste originating? Is it coming from out <br />of the County? If so, what agreements have been made? <br />One part of the document states that the proposal to increase the <br />permitted daily capacity from 850 to 1,200 cubic yards per day. <br />Please refer to page 11, Item 13, where the increase is stated to <br />be from 850 to 1,200 tons. The units should be consistent <br />throughout the document. <br />Initial Study Item 3. Water <br />According to the document, mitigation measures include <br />continuance of monitoring the ground and surface water at the <br />site for contamination. Additionally, the onsite drainage system <br />will be continuously monitored and maintained at safe levels. <br />Monitoring comprises only a part of mitigation. It would be <br />helpful if the negative declaration included a diagram of <br />the onsite drainage plan with an explanation of how it <br />functions. Also, the document should, at a minimum, provide <br />a description of the monitoring that is ongoing at this <br />facility. <br />Initial Study Item 9. Natural Resources <br />The document states that increased traffic on-sitLwould cause an <br />increase in fuel usage. It further states that earlier than <br />scheduled site closure would negate any interim fuel usage. <br />Fuel usage is not "negated" by indirect means such as <br />closure of a facility. Once fuel is used, it's gone. <br />Enitial Study Item 17. Human Health <br />Is there a load checking program or a hazardous waste screening <br />program at this site. If there is, it should be described in the <br />document. If there is not, staff recommend that these programs <br />be implemented as soon as possible. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposed negative <br />declaration. Staff request a copy of the negative declaration <br />which is intended for local adoption prior to the public hearing. <br />If you have any questions regarding these comments, or require <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.