Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Soil Investigations for Data Collection in the Delta <br />Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 128 <br />typically grows in valley and foothill grassland (CNPS 2019). The microhabitat for <br />caper-fruited tropidocarpum includes alkaline clay soils (CDFW 2019). Caper- <br />fruited tropidocarpum is threatened by grazing, military activities, trampling, and <br />non-native plants (CNPS 2019). This species has moderate potential to occur <br />within the Study Area based on the presence of potentially suitable habitat. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO-18, and MM BIO-19 would <br />reduce potential impacts to caper-fruited tropidocarpum to: Less than Significant <br />with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive <br />natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations <br />or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service? <br /> <br />Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Fifteen sensitive natural <br />communities were identified as having the potential to occur within the Study Area <br />based on review of the CNDDB (CDFW 2019). These include: alkali meadow, alkali <br />seep, northern claypan vernal pool, northern hardpan vernal pool, valley <br />needlegrass grassland, cismontane alkali marsh, coastal and valley freshwater <br />marsh, coastal brackish marsh, elderberry savanna, Great Valley cottonwood <br />riparian forest, Great Valley mixed riparian forest, Great Valley valley oak riparian <br />forest, sycamore alluvial woodland, valley sink scrub, and valley oak woodland. <br />Further discussion of these habitat types as they relate to potential Impact Areas can <br />be found in the species specific discussions above. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO-12, for mitigation of potential <br />impacts to vernal pool invertebrates, and MM BIO-1b, for mitigation of potential <br />impacts to wetlands, would reduce potential impacts to alkali meadow, alkali seep, <br />northern claypan vernal pool, northern hardpan vernal pool, cismontane alkali <br />marsh, coastal and valley freshwater marsh, coastal brackish marsh, and valley sink <br />scrub habitats to: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM BIO-13, for mitigation of potential impacts <br />to Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle, would reduce potential impacts to elderberry <br />savanna to: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM BIO-19, for mitigation of potential impacts <br />to special-status plants as a result of minor vegetation removal, would reduce <br />potential impacts to Great Valley cottonwood riparian forest, Great Valley mixed <br />riparian forest, Great Valley oak riparian forest, sycamore alluvial woodland, and <br />valley oak woodland to: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />The Proposed Project would have the potential to minimally impact valley <br />needlegrass grassland. Given the small and temporary footprint of each Impact <br />Area, potential impacts to valley needlegrass grassland would be Less than <br />Significant.