My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CO0052918
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WALNUT GROVE
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
CO0052918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 10:51:25 AM
Creation date
3/5/2021 10:16:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
RECORD_ID
CO0052918
PE
2900
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
WALNUT GROVE
City
WALNUT GROVE
ENTERED_DATE
11/4/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
WALNUT GROVE & OTHERS
RECEIVED_DATE
11/4/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\ymoreno
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Soil Investigations for Data Collection in the Delta <br />Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 128 <br />typically grows in valley and foothill grassland (CNPS 2019). The microhabitat for <br />caper-fruited tropidocarpum includes alkaline clay soils (CDFW 2019). Caper- <br />fruited tropidocarpum is threatened by grazing, military activities, trampling, and <br />non-native plants (CNPS 2019). This species has moderate potential to occur <br />within the Study Area based on the presence of potentially suitable habitat. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO-18, and MM BIO-19 would <br />reduce potential impacts to caper-fruited tropidocarpum to: Less than Significant <br />with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive <br />natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations <br />or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service? <br /> <br />Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Fifteen sensitive natural <br />communities were identified as having the potential to occur within the Study Area <br />based on review of the CNDDB (CDFW 2019). These include: alkali meadow, alkali <br />seep, northern claypan vernal pool, northern hardpan vernal pool, valley <br />needlegrass grassland, cismontane alkali marsh, coastal and valley freshwater <br />marsh, coastal brackish marsh, elderberry savanna, Great Valley cottonwood <br />riparian forest, Great Valley mixed riparian forest, Great Valley valley oak riparian <br />forest, sycamore alluvial woodland, valley sink scrub, and valley oak woodland. <br />Further discussion of these habitat types as they relate to potential Impact Areas can <br />be found in the species specific discussions above. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO-12, for mitigation of potential <br />impacts to vernal pool invertebrates, and MM BIO-1b, for mitigation of potential <br />impacts to wetlands, would reduce potential impacts to alkali meadow, alkali seep, <br />northern claypan vernal pool, northern hardpan vernal pool, cismontane alkali <br />marsh, coastal and valley freshwater marsh, coastal brackish marsh, and valley sink <br />scrub habitats to: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM BIO-13, for mitigation of potential impacts <br />to Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle, would reduce potential impacts to elderberry <br />savanna to: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM BIO-19, for mitigation of potential impacts <br />to special-status plants as a result of minor vegetation removal, would reduce <br />potential impacts to Great Valley cottonwood riparian forest, Great Valley mixed <br />riparian forest, Great Valley oak riparian forest, sycamore alluvial woodland, and <br />valley oak woodland to: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />The Proposed Project would have the potential to minimally impact valley <br />needlegrass grassland. Given the small and temporary footprint of each Impact <br />Area, potential impacts to valley needlegrass grassland would be Less than <br />Significant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.