CO0052918 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Soil Investigations for Data Collection in the Delta Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 130 With the implementation of Mitigation Measures MM HYD-1, MM AES-2, MM BIO- 14, and MM BIO-1 potential impacts to the movement of native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or native wildlife nursery sites would be reduced to: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. The Study Area overlaps six counties, each of which has a county general plan outlining goals and strategies for conservation of ecologically significant lands, wetlands, plant and wildlife habitat; protection of rare, threatened and endangered species of fish, wildlife and plants, significant plant communities, and other resources which stand out as unique because of their scarcity, scientific value, aesthetic quality or cultural significance; and encouragement of the preservation and restoration of the natural characteristics of each county. The Proposed Project would not conflict with the policies and strategies outlined in the 2030 County Wide General Plan for Yolo County (Yolo County 2009), the Contra Costa County General Plan 2005-2020 (CCCDCD 2005), the San Joaquin County General Plan Policy Document (Mintierharnish Planning Consultants 2016), the East County Area Plan: A Portion of the Alameda County General Plan (ACCDAPD 1994), the Solano County General Plan (Solano County 2008) and the Sacramento County General Plan of 2005 – 2030 (Sacramento County 2011). While there would be no impact regarding local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinances, implementation of Mitigation Measure MM AES-1, MM AES-2, MM BIO-1 through 20, MM HYD-1 and MM HAZ-1 through 4 would further avoid, minimize and/or reduce the potential for impacts. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Less than Significant Impact. The Study Area overlaps four Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP) and one Habitat Conservation Strategy: • San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) (San Joaquin County 2000), • Yolo County NHP (ICF 2018), • East Alameda County Conservation Strategy (ICF 2010), • East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan (East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy 2006), and