Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Soil Investigations for Data Collection in the Delta <br />Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 186 <br />highway, place, change, or renew an encroachment. The road commissioner may also <br />require a satisfactory bond be paid. In the Study Area, Impact Areas associated with <br />transportation under county jurisdiction that could be affected by the Proposed Project <br />include: <br />• Contra Costa County Road – Byron Highway; <br />• Sacramento County Road – Lambert Road; <br />• San Joaquin County Roads - W Walnut Grove Road, and N Staten Island Road; <br />and. <br />• Yolo County Roads – Clarksburg Road, and N Courtland Road. <br />Caltrans is responsible for planning, designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining <br />all state-owned roadways throughout the state. Federal highway standards are <br />implemented in California by Caltrans. Caltrans has jurisdiction over State highways <br />and sets maximum load limits for trucks and safety requirements for oversized vehicles <br />that operate on highways. Caltrans requires a traffic analysis be conducted depending <br />on the number of trips conducted at different levels of service conditions. In the Study <br />Area, Impact Areas under Caltrans jurisdiction that could be affected by the Proposed <br />Project include: State Route 160, State Route 4, State Route 104 - Twin Cities Road, <br />State Route 220, and State Route 84. <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 establishes a new method for analyzing certain <br />transportation impacts created by a project. Under the new requirements, circulation <br />impacts must be analyzed based on vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”). VMT “refers to the <br />amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a Proposed Project. Other <br />relevant considerations may include the effects of the Proposed Project on transit and <br />non-motorized travel.” (CEQA Guidelines, section 15064.3, subd. (a).) With this update <br />to the CEQA guidelines, the Proposed Project’s potential “effect on automobile delay <br />shall not constitute a significant environmental impact.” Each Lead Agency is <br />responsible for establishing their own thresholds of significance and may elect to be <br />governed by the provisions of this section immediately or wait until the July 1, 2020 <br />deadline. <br />While the General Plans for Alameda, Contra Costa, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano, <br />and Yolo Counties outline goals and policies that include reduction of VMTs, they have <br />not yet adopted VMT standards pursuant to Section 15064.3 of the CEQA guidelines. <br />3.17.2 Discussion <br />a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation <br />system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? <br /> <br />Less than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project consists of soil ingestions, which <br />are temporary in nature and would not permanently alter the circulation system, <br />including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities, or alter the use of these <br />facilities. The Proposed Project does not conflict with local VMT standards, as the <br />counties which the Study Area is located have not yet adopted these standards.