Laserfiche WebLink
VII. Geology And Soils. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial <br />adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or <br />death involving: <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as <br />delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the <br />State Geologist for the area or based on other <br />substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br />Division of Mines and Geology Special <br />Publication 42. <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? <br />iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including <br />liquefaction? <br />iv) Landslides? <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of <br />topsoil? <br />c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, <br />or that would become unstable as a result of the <br />project, and potentially result in on- or off-site <br />landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction <br />or collapse? <br />d) Be located on expansive soil and create direct or <br />indirect risks to life or property? <br />e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the <br />use of septic tanks or alternative waste water <br />disposal systems where sewers are not available for <br />the disposal of waste water? <br />f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br />paleontological resource or site or unique geologic <br />feature? <br />Imoact Discussion: <br />Potentially Less Than Less Than Analyzed <br />Significant Significant with Significant No In The <br />9 Mitigation 9 <br />Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br />U D D X D <br />E <br />E <br />D <br />X <br />D <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />X <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />D <br />X <br />D <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />X <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />X <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />D <br />X <br />D <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />X <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />X <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />E <br />X <br />E <br />a- b) The General Plan Map Amendment and Zone Reclassification, do not propose any commercial development within the <br />scope of the applications. Therefore, the application requests will not have any impact on geology and soils. Any <br />subsequent commercial development of the project site will have to comply with the California Building Code (CBC) <br />which includes provisions for soils reports for grading and foundations as well as design criteria for seismic loading and <br />other geologic hazards based on fault and seismic hazard mapping. All recommendations from a soils report must be <br />incorporated into the construction plans. Similarly, any grading for future development will be done under permit and <br />will be required to comply with the grading provisions of the California Building Code. <br />c -d) The proposed project, a General Plan Map Amendment and Zone Reclassification and does not propose any <br />commercial development within the scope of the applications, therefore will not affect geology and soils. Any subsequent <br />PA -2100019 and PA -2100020 — Initial Study 13 <br />Planning Commission Staff Report, PA -2100019, 20 (GP, ZR) 17 <br />Environmental Review <br />