My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014056
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
POCK
>
3009
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2100031
>
SU0014056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2022 9:36:37 AM
Creation date
4/7/2021 2:18:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014056
PE
2666
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2100031
STREET_NUMBER
3009
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
POCK
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205-
APN
17912011, -13, -14
ENTERED_DATE
4/7/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3009 S POCK LN
RECEIVED_DATE
7/6/2022 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\lsauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1803
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 8, 2021 d anc <br /> edGeo <br /> Project No. 21-6289 An Empfoyre-Owned Campy <br /> Page 12 "' <br /> AGI's review of the referenced databases also considered the potential or likelihood of <br /> contamination from adjoining and nearby sites. To evaluate which of the adjoining and <br /> nearby sites identified in the regulatory database report present an environmental risk <br /> to the subject property, AGI considered the following: <br /> • The type of database on which the site is identified; <br /> • The topographic position of the identified site relative to the subject property; <br /> • The direction and distance of the identified site from the subject property; <br /> • Local soil conditions in the subject property area; <br /> • The known or inferred groundwater flow direction in the subject property area; <br /> • The status of the respective regulatory agency-required investigation(s) of the <br /> identified site (if any); and <br /> • Surface and subsurface obstructions and diversions (e.g., buildings, roads, sewer <br /> systems, utility service lines, rivers, lakes and ditches located between the <br /> identified site and the subject property. <br /> Only those sites that are judged to present a potential environmental risk to the subject <br /> property and/or warrant additional clarification are further evaluated. Using the <br /> referenced criteria and based on a review of readily available information contained <br /> within the regulatory database report, AGI did not identify adjacent or nearby sites (e.g. <br /> within '/4-mile radius) listed on the regulatory database report that were judged to <br /> present a potential environmental risk to the subject property with the exception of the <br /> following: <br /> Site Distance Direction Database(s) & Environmental Concern <br /> Summary <br /> CONTI TRUCKING 392 Feet East(Down-gradient) LUST - The facility is No indication - Due to the <br /> (2660 Loomis Road) listed on the LUST distance from the subject <br /> database for 2 property, direction from the <br /> incidences of leaking subject property, medium <br /> underground storage affected by the facility, and <br /> tanks. The first regulatory status, this facility <br /> incident involved the does not likely represent an <br /> release of solvents in environmental concern for the <br /> 1992 with impact to subject property. <br /> soil. This case was <br /> closed in 1996. The <br /> second case involved <br /> the release of diesel <br /> with impact to soil in <br /> 1999. The second <br /> case was closed in <br /> 2000. <br /> NATIONAL 738 Feet East(Down-gradient) LUST - Facility is No indication - Due to the <br /> FREIGHT(2850 listed on the lust distance from the subject <br /> Loomis Road) database due to the property, direction from the <br /> release of diesel fuel subject property, and regulatory <br /> to soil and status, this facility does not likely <br /> groundwater in 1998. represent an environmental <br /> The facility was concern for the subject property. <br /> remediated and <br /> monitored. The case <br /> received regulatory <br /> closure in 2012. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.