Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br /> • If disposal site remains—RP will need to ensure that site meets state minimum standards for cover, <br /> , <br /> drainage, erosion control, security, landfill gas migration, post-closure land-use change approval from <br /> LEA and property transfer notification to the LEA <br /> We can discuss during conference call on Friday. <br /> Glenn <br /> From: Robert McClellon [EH] [mailto:RMcClellon@sicehd.com] <br /> Sent:Tuesday,June 02, 2015 2:10 PM <br /> To:Young,Glenn@CalRecycle <br /> Subject: RE:SW 39-CR-0022 <br /> Glenn,thanks. I will pass that a long. Robert <br /> From: Young, Glen n@CalRecycle [mai[to:Glen n.Young CaIRecycle.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:47 AM <br /> To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: SW 39-CR-0022 <br /> Robert—a geophysical survey may provide useful data to them—both from defining the lateral extent and also <br /> depending on the methodology, e.g. GPR-the density of the site and suitability for construction. <br /> Ultimately(with additional investigation or not)—I don't think you can get away from requiring a post closure <br /> maintenance plan (as a condition of the PCLU)—that supports making cover/drainage/erosion repairs due to changing <br /> site conditions. <br /> In other words—the RP should understand that as long as the disposal site exists they will be responsible for state <br /> minimum standards and long-term maintenance and monitoring. <br /> Glenn <br /> From: Robert McClellon [EH] [mailto:RMcClellon@sicehd.com] <br /> Sent:Tuesday,lune 02,2015 10:18 AM <br /> To:Young,Glenn@CalRecycle <br /> Subject: RE:SW 39-CR-0022 <br /> Glenn, with that said,what make you more comfortable with site conditions?We can ask for more trenches, borings <br /> and/or more sampling. How about the ground penetrating radar?They have the money and are willing to do more <br /> work. If you have an idea, let me know I will talk with them. Robert <br /> From: Young, Glenn @Ca[Recycle [ma ilto:Glen n.Young@Cal Recycle.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 9:59 AM <br /> To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: SW 39-CR-0022 <br /> Robert-open space Parking lot should have nominal issues(unless it is used as a mobile home park). Assuming the <br /> depth of waste is only 6 inches—they could probably achieve design compaction for a parking lot (90%) using standard <br /> earth compacting equipment(vibratory roller). <br /> 2 <br />