My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS_CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
936
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507178
>
WORK PLANS_CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/25/2021 3:13:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2021 5:06:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
FileName_PostFix
CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0507178
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007729
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON MULTMODAL
STREET_NUMBER
936
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
936 E WEBER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Wright Environmental __ <br /> September 15, 1997 NORCAL <br /> Page 3 <br /> subsurface to a depth of about 10-15 feet. This measurement is sensitive to <br /> differences in the subsurface materials that may include earth materials and foreign <br /> debris. The IP component measurement is an indication of the electromagnetic signal <br /> and is more sensitive to metallic sources that TC. The EMLL equipment was used <br /> locate metallic pipelines. The GPR was used over a few representative variations to <br /> aid in further identifying possible sources. <br /> DATA ACQUISITION <br /> A reference grid, consisting of a northing and easting coordinate system, was <br /> established over each of the areas of investigation. We used fluorescent pink spray <br /> paint and a fiberglass measuring tape to mark a 20 ft by 20 ft grid over the accessible <br /> portions of each Parcel. This coordinate system provided horizontal control for all of <br /> the geophysical measurements. After the reference grid was established, we <br /> performed a reconnaissance scan of each area using EMLL equipment to detect the <br /> approximate routings of any underground utilities. This information is useful when <br /> interpreting the VMG and EM data. We then collected the VMG and EM data at 10 <br /> foot intervals along north-south trending traverses spaced 10 feet apart over the <br /> reference grids. GPR data were obtained over a few localized areas as necessary to <br /> obtain additional subsurface information regarding possible buried metallic sources. <br /> DATA ANALYSIS <br /> VMG and EM Data Processina <br /> At the completion of the investigations, we downloaded the VMG data, and the <br /> terrain conductivity (TC) and in-phase (IP) components of the EM data to a computer <br /> for processing. The computer processing included calculating an evenly spaced array <br /> of values (grid) based on the observed field data. These gridded values were then <br /> computer contoured to produce the Vertical Magnetic Gradient, Terrain Conductivity, <br /> and In-Phase Contour Maps shown on Plates 4-8. <br /> Contour Ma Interpretation <br /> Both above ground metallic sources as well as localized buried objects such as UST's, <br /> drums, or consolidated buried debris can be represented on contour maps by closely <br /> spaced closed contours. In addition, linear contours, or groups of contour closures <br /> forming a linear trend are often caused by laterally continuous features such as utility <br /> alignments. Characteristic contour trends that cannot be attributed to known above <br /> or below ground sources are considered anomalous and may be likely locations for <br /> buried objects or debris. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.