My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0083887_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
9220
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0083887_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:46:20 PM
Creation date
7/15/2021 8:53:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0083887
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
STEEL & OIL
STREET_NUMBER
9220
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05507021
ENTERED_DATE
6/21/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9220 W HWY 12
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil Suitability /Nitrate Loading Study Irerracon <br />Ehlers Property Lodi, California <br />May 13, 2021 Terracon Project No. NA217019 <br />Table 4. <br />Expected Onsite Maximum Septic Tank Usage <br />Gallons per day (GPD). Gallons per 10 hour day (GPD10). Gallons per 12 hour day (GPD12) <br />Employee Effluent 10 hour day is 15 gpd x 1.25 = 18.75 gpd (GPD10) <br />Employee Effluent 12 hour day is 15 gpd x 1.5 = 22.5 gpd (GPD12) <br />Visitor effluent 5 gpd. Visitors are assumed to be onsite less than 8 hours per day. <br />The maximum daily flow rate for the grain operations is approximately 93.75 gpd. The proposed <br />hemp operation is anticipated to add approximately 127.50 gallons of effluent per day for a <br />combined maximum daily flow rate of approximately 221 gpd for the facility. <br />1.4 Groundwater Information <br />1.4.1 Groundwater Depth and Gradient <br />During our field activities, groundwater was encountered at approximately 5.5 feet bgs within our <br />soil profile boring B2 which was advanced to 6.0 feet bgs. There were no Well Completion <br />Reports for the onsite well. <br />Terracon searched the California Department of Water Resources Sustainable Groundwater <br />Management Act (SMGA) Data Viewer, however, groundwater data was not available for the site. <br />Based on a review of nearby Well Completion Reports, groundwater levels near the site ranged <br />between 3.8 and 6 feet bgs. The groundwater flow direction and the depth to shallow, unconfined <br />groundwater, if present, would likely vary depending upon seasonal variations in rainfall and other <br />hydrogeological features. Without the benefit of on-site groundwater monitoring wells surveyed to <br />a datum, groundwater depth and flow direction beneath the site cannot be directly ascertained. <br />1.4.2 Potential Groundwater Contamination Issues <br />Potential groundwater contamination can occur from a number of sources including historical <br />petroleum hydrocarbon use, agricultural activities, dairies, septic systems, and storm water <br />infiltration. As per EHD requirements nitrate as N and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) have <br />been included as part of the SSS discussion. Identifying potential groundwater contamination <br />other than nitrates and DBCP is beyond the scope of work for this report. <br />The presence of nitrates is not uncommon in shallow groundwater aquifers in San Joaquin County <br />and other parts of the Central Valley. Nitrate in groundwater occurs as a result of the application <br />Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7 <br />Maximum <br />Septic <br />Number <br />Hours of <br />Number of <br />Employee Effluent <br />Number <br />Visitor <br />Septic Tank <br />Usage <br />System <br />Facility Use <br />Operation <br />Employees <br />(18.75 GPD10) <br />Visitors <br />Effluent <br />Employee <br />No. <br />per day <br />per day <br />(22.5 GPD12) <br />per day <br />(x5 GPD) <br />GPD + Visitor <br />GPD <br />Grain Facility <br />10 <br />5 <br />93.75 <br />0 <br />0 <br />93.75 <br />1 <br />Proposed <br />12 <br />5 <br />112.50 <br />3 <br />15 <br />127.50 <br />Hemp Facility <br />Total <br />221.25 <br />Gallons per day (GPD). Gallons per 10 hour day (GPD10). Gallons per 12 hour day (GPD12) <br />Employee Effluent 10 hour day is 15 gpd x 1.25 = 18.75 gpd (GPD10) <br />Employee Effluent 12 hour day is 15 gpd x 1.5 = 22.5 gpd (GPD12) <br />Visitor effluent 5 gpd. Visitors are assumed to be onsite less than 8 hours per day. <br />The maximum daily flow rate for the grain operations is approximately 93.75 gpd. The proposed <br />hemp operation is anticipated to add approximately 127.50 gallons of effluent per day for a <br />combined maximum daily flow rate of approximately 221 gpd for the facility. <br />1.4 Groundwater Information <br />1.4.1 Groundwater Depth and Gradient <br />During our field activities, groundwater was encountered at approximately 5.5 feet bgs within our <br />soil profile boring B2 which was advanced to 6.0 feet bgs. There were no Well Completion <br />Reports for the onsite well. <br />Terracon searched the California Department of Water Resources Sustainable Groundwater <br />Management Act (SMGA) Data Viewer, however, groundwater data was not available for the site. <br />Based on a review of nearby Well Completion Reports, groundwater levels near the site ranged <br />between 3.8 and 6 feet bgs. The groundwater flow direction and the depth to shallow, unconfined <br />groundwater, if present, would likely vary depending upon seasonal variations in rainfall and other <br />hydrogeological features. Without the benefit of on-site groundwater monitoring wells surveyed to <br />a datum, groundwater depth and flow direction beneath the site cannot be directly ascertained. <br />1.4.2 Potential Groundwater Contamination Issues <br />Potential groundwater contamination can occur from a number of sources including historical <br />petroleum hydrocarbon use, agricultural activities, dairies, septic systems, and storm water <br />infiltration. As per EHD requirements nitrate as N and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) have <br />been included as part of the SSS discussion. Identifying potential groundwater contamination <br />other than nitrates and DBCP is beyond the scope of work for this report. <br />The presence of nitrates is not uncommon in shallow groundwater aquifers in San Joaquin County <br />and other parts of the Central Valley. Nitrate in groundwater occurs as a result of the application <br />Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.