COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

gallons of diesel were found in UDC sump 16A/17B, and the service technician, Mr. Fajardin, stated that it was the same diesel found in October because he had never pumped it out. Mr. Fajardin pumped the diesel out and placed it into one of the diesel USTs. During a review of the facility's paperwork, Ms. Henry found the Unified Program Consolidated Forms (UPCF) for facility information and tank information were not current, maintenance records and alarm history log were not maintained, and current financial responsibility documents were not submitted to the EHD. None of the releases were recorded and reported as outlined on the facility's approved response plan. On December 24, 2008, Ms. Henry called and left a message for Ms. Christina Gill, Vice President for B&G Group, Inc. Ms. Henry wanted to meet with Ms. Gill to review the UST inspection report. On December 30, 2008, Ms. Henry called Ms. Gill, who stated she just arrived at work and was dealing with a landscaping problem. Ms. Gill told Ms. Henry she would like to meet the following week and would call back. Ms. Gill did not call back. On January 6, 2009, Ms. Henry delivered a copy of the December 22, 2008, UST inspection report to the facility and sent a copy to the owner via certified mail (Attachment 11). Attachment 12 includes the alarm histories before and after testing on December 22, 2008. On January 9, 2009, a monitoring system certification test report for the October 30, 2008, testing was submitted two months late (Attachment 13). Test reports are required to be submitted within 30 days of testing. Also submitted was the December 22, 2008, monitoring system certification test report (Attachment 14) and a test report for the components replaced and tested under permit SR0055872 (Attachment 15). On January 27, 2009, Ms. Henry received a voice mail from Ms. Gill who stated she was having the monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing done next week. Ms. Henry called Ms. Gill and asked her why she was having the testing done. Ms. Gill stated that was what the inspection report indicated. Ms. Henry was at the annual CUPA conference and did not have the file with her, so she asked Ms. Gill to read the inspection report to her. Ms. Gill stated she did not have a copy of the report with her, and Ms. Henry asked her to call back when she had a copy of the report. Ms. Henry explained that she wanted to meet with her to review the inspection reports so Ms. Gill would understand what was required. Ms. Henry reminded Ms. Gill that she still needed to address the violations from all three inspection reports. On January 28, 2009, Ms. Henry returned a call from Ms. Gill, who referred to the violations that were noted on all three 2008 inspection reports. Ms. Henry explained that the testing was currently up to date and that the violations were written because they were performed late. Ms. Henry asked Ms. Gill if the inspector reviewed all the requirements with her at the time of the final inspection in 2007. Ms. Gill said yes. Ms. Henry reminded Ms. Gill that she still needed to address the violations from all three inspection reports. On February 18, 2009, permit application SR0056549 was submitted to replace a flex hose connector in the south diesel piping sump. Mr. Mike Flores, Stockton Service 3