My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
77-764
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
7430
>
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
>
77-764
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2019 10:09:45 PM
Creation date
12/1/2017 12:13:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
RECORD_ID
77-764
STREET_NUMBER
7430
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
SITE_LOCATION
7430 E WATERLOO RD
RECEIVED_DATE
07/26/1977
P_LOCATION
M L HOWELL
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\W\WATERLOO\7430\77-764.PDF
QuestysFileName
77-764
QuestysRecordID
1978793
QuestysRecordType
12
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOORMAN'S WATER SYSTEMS <br /> CONTRACTORS LIC. #267696 <br /> WELL DRILLING <br /> PUMP SALES - SERVICE - INSTALLATION <br /> LARRY H. MOORMAN SPRINKLER SYSTEMS LICENSED INSURED <br /> WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT <br /> 4243 Cherryland Ave., Stockton, Ca. 95205 <br /> Phone 931-3210 <br /> February 6, 1979 <br /> Director Daniel Welebir <br /> San Joaquin Local Health Dist. <br /> 1601 E. Hazelton Ave. <br /> Stockton, Calif. 95206 <br /> RE; Your letter of November 13, 1978 j <br /> After our discussion of this letter it was my understanding <br /> that you would look further into the facts, and get back to me. <br /> On the well in question some settled clay or clay off the well <br /> wall caused your inspectors' line to go less than 50 feet, the <br /> depth required. This was cleared to 48 feet by probing the annular <br /> space with a string of pipe. <br /> Your inspector had to leave early that day for some reason. <br /> We still had two well to grout. I asked if the inspector said <br /> we could not grout them. One man said no, he hadn't, and the <br /> other man said we could not grout the well scheduled in Linden. <br /> I then directed the grouting of the well in question. This <br /> was all sone late in the day on a Friday by radio. As I was <br /> trying to get my drilling rig off a job and back to the shop. <br /> At the time it was understood by the one man that it was not <br /> okay to grout the Linden well whileh was later inspected and <br /> passed. Other irritating factors were the Mitchler Cement Co. <br /> being 2 hrs. and 10 mins. later than promised and the first well <br /> grouted also having to be probed down. <br /> We by no mean were attempting to get away with anything. we <br /> have records to show 6 yards of concrete were used in 3 wells <br /> which certainly shows that they took the normal amount. We also <br /> wasted 3 yards of concrete at $50.00 per yard, Lather than grout <br /> a well that could have been grouted if we wanted to grout wells <br /> without inspections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.