Laserfiche WebLink
Taj Bahadori <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />July 6, 2018 <br />release from the unit. The RWQCB also stated in the NOV that volatile organic <br />compounds (VOCs) continue to be detected in groundwater well MW -3 and continue to be <br />detected in vadose zone monitoring devices. <br />Based on our discussion with you, it appears that the County acknowledges that unlined <br />Module I is the source of VOCs in the groundwater and the vadose zone at FSL. It also <br />appears that the County acknowledges that landfill gas (LFG) migrating from the base of <br />Module I is the source of VOCs in the groundwater and the vadose zone. VOCs have been <br />consistently detected at the following locations as shown of Figure 1: <br />Groundwater monitoring well MW -3 <br />Single completion probe soil gas devices SG -1, -4, -5, -7, & -9 <br />Triple completion probe soil gas devices SG -2A, -3A, -6A, -10A, & -I IA <br />Figure I shows that the soil gas probe devices form a relative tight monitoring network <br />around Module I. In addition, the triple probe devices show that VOCs are present all the <br />way down to groundwater at all triple probe locations. Because VOCs were detected all <br />the way to groundwater at every location that a single shallow probe was replaced with a <br />triple probe, it is highly likely that at the remaining single probe locations, VOCs have also <br />migrated all the way down to groundwater. Deep probe location SG -I is paired with <br />monitoring well MW -3, which contains VOCs. In addition, it is highly likely that at every <br />probe location, whether or not it is a single or triple probe, VOCs have migrated into <br />groundwater. Therefore, the County may want to consider acknowledging that it is likely at <br />each probe location, groundwater may be impacted by VOCs that have migrated from the <br />base of unlined Module I. <br />Based on this conservative, but highly likely interpretation of VOC impact, APTIM does <br />not believe that a new monitoring well near SG -6 would provide any new information on <br />the extent of impact from Module I. APTIM believes that the County's resources are <br />better -allocated on the installation of more LFG extraction wells. As such, APTIM <br />recommends the County install three (3) to five (5) new LFG extraction wells in lieu of <br />installing a groundwater monitoring well near SG -6. The only mechanism to remove the <br />LFGNOC impact from the vadose zone and groundwater is to extract more LFG from <br />Module I. <br />Re -install Background Well MW -4 <br />The RWQCB stated in the NOV that the DMP requires a background well that can provide <br />consistent groundwater samples to determine if up -gradient water quality is changing. <br />Background well MW -4 has been dry for two consecutive years. The last water level <br />measurement taken in MW -4 was during the fourth quarter 2015 monitoring event. <br />APTIM understands that the County will install a new background well MW -4A, adjacent <br />to MW -4. MW -4A will be used to determine if up -gradient water quality is changing for <br />2018-07-16 FH Workplan <br />