My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014570
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Q
>
QUASHNICK
>
5653
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-89-1
>
SU0014570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2022 4:02:57 PM
Creation date
12/27/2021 2:16:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014570
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
SU-89-1
STREET_NUMBER
5653
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
QUASHNICK
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
APN
08607014
ENTERED_DATE
12/8/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
5653 E QUASHNICK RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\jcastaneda
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3, The project is in a designated rural residential <br /> area. The large lot size should help maintain a <br /> rural atmosphere. <br /> 4. In adopting the RR-65, RR-100, and RR-200 zones <br /> the county established minimum parcel sizes for the <br /> rural residential areas. <br /> 5. Retention of run-off water on each individual <br /> parcel is proposed. <br /> 6. The proposed subdivision contains no flag lots <br /> however lots fronting on both Quashnick and Ashley <br /> are proposed. As these roads have low traffic volumes <br /> 588 vehicles/day for Quashnick and 674 vehicles/day <br /> for Ashley. Severe traffic problems are not anticipated. <br /> III ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br /> A. Environmental Impact of the Project : <br /> 1. Impact on Adjoining Land Use : <br /> The project site has residential areas to the <br /> south and west, a railroad to the east and <br /> agricultural land to the north. Part of the <br /> area to the north if being developed as a rural <br /> residential subdivision. It is assumed that <br /> further residential development will be <br /> compatible with existing and proposed residen- <br /> tial uses. Residential use will be itself <br /> impacted by noise from the railroad. If <br /> fencing is provided danger of rail movements <br /> to residents would be minimized. If the fence <br /> were solid, it would attenuate the noise of rail <br /> movements. It is therefore suggested that a 6' <br /> solid fence be provided along the California <br /> Traction Railroad as a mitigation measure to <br /> reduce noise impact and prevent persons from <br /> wandering onto the track. <br /> 2. Noise Impacts : <br /> There are approximately 4 train movements per <br /> day on the California Traction Railroad. This <br /> is increased to about 10 per day during the <br /> summer, while this number is not as large as <br /> the number of train movements compared with the <br /> • mainlines of the Transcontinental Railroads, the <br /> movements especially at night could disturb <br /> residents within several hundred feet of the <br /> track. For this reason a barrier as noted under <br /> "Impact on Adjoining Land Use" would be a useful <br /> mitigation measure. <br /> -11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.