Laserfiche WebLink
The Modesto Bee San Joaquin/Tuolumne Edition Monday, June 8, r;987- <br />Region B-2 <br />State B-3metro <br />B.- <br />Comics B-4 Section' <br />Report outlines troubles with Tracy project <br />ByMICHAEL DOYLE <br />Be, staff writer <br />T^ACY — A proposal to build 14 hous- <br />es . outheast of the city illustrates the up <br />and downsides of San Joaquin County's <br />growth. <br />A recently completed draft environ- <br />mental impact report details a proposal <br />for what is called the Traina Brothers <br />property. <br />The draft report, received by county <br />officials Friday, examines both the <br />Traina Brothers' specific proposal for 26 <br />acres, and the larger consequences of <br />developing 410 acres in the area. <br />The proposed Traina Brothers develop- <br />ment now is an apricot orchard, located <br />between Fairoaks and Linne roads south- <br />east of the city limits. <br />To build 14 houses on their 26 acres, <br />the developers need a general plan <br />amendment and a zoning change. That <br />area presently is zoned for agriculture. <br />"County policy now discourages expan- <br />sion of rural residential areas," Associate <br />Planner Bruce Baracco said. <br />County policies intend the rural resi- <br />dential zone to allow housing in areas <br />already so split up that significant farm- <br />ing no longer can take place. <br />The Traina proposal by itself would not <br />significantly reduce the county's farming <br />acreage, the report notes. <br />But the proposal would continue the <br />loss of area farmland, the report states, <br />and potentially would contribute to ongo- <br />ing conflicts between farmers and resi- <br />dents. <br />"Production levels in the area are al- <br />ready being affected by varying degrees <br />of urban encroachment," the report <br />states. <br />The proposal's inconsistency with <br />some parts of both county and city plan- <br />ning policies must be addressed, the re- <br />port says. <br />The new houses, according to the pro- <br />posal, would use individual wells for wa- <br />ter and septic tanks for sewage. <br />But county policies adopted this year <br />state that rural residential projects of this <br />size should hook up to public water <br />systems. <br />Concerns about ground water stem <br />from the discovery of toxics beneath the <br />Tracy Defense Depot, located less than <br />one-quarter mile from the site. <br />The project represents the kind of <br />"leapfrog" development that both city <br />and county policies seek to prevent, the <br />report states. <br />The report suggests county planners <br />re-evaluate rural residential policies, and <br />urges all rural residential developments <br />comply with policies relating to water <br />and sewage disposal. <br />If applied to the Traina proposal, that <br />would force a change from individual <br />wells to a public water system and a <br />public storm drain system. <br />Any new houses would have to be <br />shielded from train and truck noise, ac- <br />cording to the report. <br />The report notes that since other land <br />suitable for development exists closer to <br />Tracy, the justification for committing <br />valuable farm land "is not firm." <br />A 45 -day public comment period on the <br />draft environmental impact report starts <br />today. The San Joaquin County Planning <br />Commission will hold a public hearing on <br />the report July 16. <br />