My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2003-2004
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2003-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2025 10:06:51 AM
Creation date
1/4/2022 2:12:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2003-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433 - LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
6484 N WAVERLY RD LINDEN 95236
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
305
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V r <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY COMPLAINT ORDER NO.R5-2003-0159 -2 - <br /> COUNTY <br /> 2 - <br /> COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN AND FOOTHILL SANITARY LANDFILL,INC. <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> includes design and construction of the soil cover for all modules in the Unit and address the <br /> performance standards for precipitation and drainage controls. The WDRs required the reports be <br /> submitted on 1 June 2003. The CWC 13267 Order required the documents to be submitted on <br /> I November 2003. <br /> 7. On 30 October 2003, the Discharger submitted the Partial Cover workplan and the Engineering <br /> Feasibility Study report. The Engineering Feasibility Study report was titled Corrective Action <br /> Plan Based on Evaluation Monitoring for Past VOC Impact at Foothill Sanitary Landfill. These <br /> documents failed to include a Closure Plan for Module"I." <br /> REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS <br /> 8. The Discharger, by the acts and omissions above, violated provisions of CWC Section 13267 <br /> (b)(1), which reads, in part, as follows: <br /> "....the regional board may require that any person who has discharged, discharges, or is suspected of <br /> having discharged or discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste within its region, or any citizen or <br /> domiciliary, or political agency or entity of this state who has discharged, discharges, or is suspected of <br /> having discharged or discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste outside of its region that could affect <br /> the quality of waters within its region, shall furnish,under penalty of perjury,technical or monitoring <br /> program reports which the regional board requires...." <br /> 9. CWC Section 13268 (a) states: <br /> "Any person failing or refusing to furnish technical or monitoring program reports as required by <br /> subdivision(b)of Section 13267, or failing or refusing to furnish a statement of compliance as required by <br /> subdivision(b) of Section 13399.2, or falsifying any information provided therein, is guilty of a <br /> misdemeanor and may be liable civilly in accordance with subdivision(b)." <br /> 10. CWC Section 13268(b)(1) states: <br /> "Civil liability may be administratively imposed by a regional board in accordance with Article 2.5 <br /> (commencing with Section 13323) of Chapter 5 for a violation of subdivision(a)in an amount which shall <br /> not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000)for each day in which the violation occurs." <br /> 11. CWC Section 13327 states: <br /> "In determining the amount of civil liability,the regional board ... shall take into consideration the nature, <br /> circumstance, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations,whether the discharge is susceptible to <br /> cleanup or abatement,the degree of toxicity of the discharge, and,with respect to the violator,the ability to <br /> pay,the effect on ability to continue in business, any voluntary cleanup efforts undertaken, any prior <br /> history of violations,the degree of culpability, economic benefit or savings, if any,resulting from the <br /> violation,and other matters as justice may require." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.