Laserfiche WebLink
POU�p <br />Q Zi <br />THOMAS R. FLINN <br />DIRECTOR <br />4<IFO HtN <br />THOMAS M. GAU <br />CHIEF DEPUTY DIRECTOR <br />MICHAEL SELLING <br />DEPUTY DIRECTOR <br />STEVEN WINKLER <br />DEPUTY DIRECTOR <br />ROGER JANES <br />BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR <br />y <br />August 19, 2010 <br />Mr. Todd Del Frate <br />California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />Central Valley Region <br />11020 Sun Center Drive, #200 <br />Rancho Cordova, California 95670-6114 <br />P. PDX 1810 - 1810 E. HAZELTON AVENUE <br />STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA 95201 <br />(209) 468-3000 FAX (209) 468-2999 <br />www.sjgov.org/pubworks <br />SUBJECT: GAS -IMPERMEABLE BARRIER OVER REFUSE AT FOOTHILL LANDFILL <br />Dear Mr. Del Frate. � I <br />The San Joaquin County Department of Public Works Solid Waste Division is in receipt of your <br />letter of August 11, 2010, in which you reaffirm the requirement by Water Board staff that the <br />County maintain the gas -impermeable barrier over unlined refuse at Module "I" at the Foothill <br />Sanitary Landfill. We share the commitment to protecting the waters of the State, however, <br />because of the potential for serious negative consequences of this requirement, we must state, <br />for the record, our continuing objection on the grounds that placing an impermeable membrane <br />over refuse may threaten groundwater, and again ask that Board staff reconsider this <br />requirement. <br />A liner of this type should only be placed under refuse. Placing an impermeable liner over <br />refuse that does not also have a base liner inhibits the upward escape of landfill gas, but <br />allows gas to move downward under positive pressure toward groundwater, possibly resulting <br />in associated groundwater contamination. We may now be seeing the effect of gas <br />entrapment at the Foothill Landfill: methane beneath the Module 1 liner has increased <br />significantly after the placement of the impermeable liner on the side -slope of Module "I". <br />Similar effects have been seen at other landfills as discussed in previous correspondence. <br />Groundwater monitoring results indicate that the groundwater at the site is free of volatile <br />organic compounds (VOCs) at this time. However, continuing to maintain a gas -impermeable <br />barrier, and possibly extending this barrier over more refuse in the future, could significantly <br />change these conditions with possibly disastrous results. <br />It is worth noting that neither CCR Title 27 nor the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for <br />the site require a landfill liner between old and new refuse. Finding 46 of the WDRs states that <br />a composite liner is required under refuse at new municipal solid waste landfills and at <br />expansion areas of existing landfills. Placement of additional waste over existing Module "I" <br />refuse does not fall under either of these two categories. <br />