My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0084717_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
285
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0084717_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2022 12:18:44 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 9:53:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0084717
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
285 S AUSTIN RD
STREET_NUMBER
285
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22802048
ENTERED_DATE
1/12/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
285 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1028
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Management Plan <br />Northeastern San Joaquin County Section 6 <br />Groundwater Banking Authority 95 Financing Options <br />6 Financing Options <br />The development of new water supplies and the necessary infrastructure is a major financial <br />undertaking. It is absolutely necessary for the Authority and its member agencies to leverage <br />as much support for outside funding. The following section is intended to provide stakeholders <br />with a general overview of the potential funding sources, programs, and project partnerships <br />available to the Authority. <br />6.1 Funding Sources <br />6.1.1 Federal Funding <br />Federal funds can be made available to the Authority and its member agencies through a <br />variety of mechanisms including, but not limited to, subsidies, appropriations, in-kind services, <br />grants, loans and cost-sharing agreements. Securing these funds is accomplished through the <br />following processes. <br />Legislative Approach - Federal funding can be secured through the legislative process to <br />directly fund an approved project. This approach is initiated by a request by the Authority to a <br />local congressional representative. The project may require the establishment of Federal <br />interest through an act of Congress and funded in subsequent years (e.g. Farmington Program). <br />If, however, the project is consistent with the goals and objectives of an existing Federal <br />program, an appropriation can be made that same year (e.g. MORE WATER Project). <br />Competition for funds through Congress is fierce and will require the broad support of local, <br />regional, and State interests. <br />Federal Agency Interest - Funding can also be secured for projects directly from Federal <br />agencies. Local projects, consistent with the goals and objectives of an agency, are eligible for <br />funds and in-kind services through directed actions and partnerships (e.g. Joint <br />USGS/DWR/Authority Groundwater Recharge and Distribution of High-Chloride Groundwater <br />from Wells Study). Federal agencies commit to projects during their respective internal <br />budgeting processes and have the flexibility to disperse funding over several years. <br />Federal Assistance Programs - Finally, a third option is to apply for project funding under an <br />existing grant, loan, or assistance program administered by any of the various Federal <br />agencies. Potential partnering agencies include the USBR, Environmental Protection Agency <br />(EPA), USACE, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (NFWS), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Eligibility, <br />cost sharing, and application requirements vary between the programs. <br />6.1.2 State Funding <br />State funds are similar to Federal funds in that they can also be secured through the legislative <br />process, state agency interest, and through competitive grants and assistance programs. The <br />availability of State funds for water resources projects is a reflection of the current fiscal climate <br />and can vary significantly. Voter approval of Proposition 50, the $3.4 Billion Water Security, <br />Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002, is expected to carry many of <br />the water resources development programs of interest to the Authority for the next few fiscal <br />years including CALFED, Integrated Storage Investigations, and other groundwater recharge <br />construction grants and loans. <br />Legislative Approach – Although the dollar amounts available from the State are usually not <br />as substantial as Federal, the State process can be somewhat more streamlined than the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.