My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0084717_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
285
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0084717_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2022 12:18:44 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 9:53:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0084717
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
285 S AUSTIN RD
STREET_NUMBER
285
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22802048
ENTERED_DATE
1/12/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
285 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1028
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Management Plan <br />Northeastern San Joaquin County Section 7 <br />Groundwater Banking Authority 98 Plan Governance <br />7 Plan Governance <br />Water interests in San Joaquin County have historically been fragmented, but have realized that <br />projects developed in a collaborative process have the potential to exhibit greater and more far <br />reaching benefits to all involved parties while increasing its implementability and fundability. <br />Implementation of the water management options can best be achieved by continuing to work in <br />a collaborative fashion to develop a broad base of political and financial support. Currently, the <br />powers and term of the Authority are limited thus, if the Authority member agencies decide that <br />the Authority should implement the Plan, then additional powers are necessary. The Authority <br />has explored numerous options concerning the appropriate organization and powers needed to <br />implement the plan and the best management framework that addresses the concerns of the <br />Authority member agencies. <br />7.1 Member Agency Concerns <br />Throughout the development of the Plan, the Stakeholder group voiced their concerns over the <br />purpose and need for a new or expanded Authority. The following concerns are presented as <br />follows: <br />• Does the purpose, goals, and objectives of the current Authority provide for the <br />implementation of the Authority Plan? <br />• What powers are necessary for the implementation of the Authority Plan? <br />• Does expanding the powers of the Authority threaten projects previously set in motion <br />by individual agencies or smaller partnerships? <br />• How will stakeholders be represented in the new Authority? <br />• How can we engage all Basin stakeholders including those who showed no interest in <br />participating in the past? <br />• How do we include Cal Water in a Joint Powers Authority? <br />• How will individuals and special interest groups be allowed to participate? <br />• How will the Authority relate to other groundwater management efforts in San Joaquin <br />County (e.g. San Joaquin County Groundwater Export Ordinance, Mokelumne River <br />Water and Power Authority – MORE WATER Project, Eastern Water Alliance – SEWD, <br />NSJWCD, & CSJWCD) <br />• How will the Authority coordinate with Basin neighbors outside of the Groundwater <br />Management Area? <br />• How will the new Authority be funded? <br />• Should the Authority be allowed to construct projects or should the member agencies <br />be the ones to construct projects? <br />• Should votes be weighed by acreage, water use, monetary contribution, or not weighted <br />at all?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.