Laserfiche WebLink
Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Management Plan <br />Northeastern San Joaquin County Section 7 <br />Groundwater Banking Authority 100 Plan Governance <br />7.2.3 Various Types of Water Districts <br />The State of California recognizes the formal organization of various water districts as political <br />subdivisions of the State. Examples of water districts include County water agencies, County <br />water districts, resource conservation districts, water districts, water conservation districts, <br />irrigation districts, water storage districts and water replenishment districts. In addition, specific <br />legislation may also be sought to create a special district or to enhance its powers. Many of the <br />individual entities represented on the water management plan stakeholder committee have <br />utilized one of these acts as the basis for their organizational structure. Stakeholders may <br />chose to annex adjacent lands, organize as a new special water district, or be incorporated into <br />an existing district to exercise its powers. Additionally, a specific benefit zone can be created <br />under the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for the purpose of <br />implementing a groundwater management program in Eastern San Joaquin County. <br />7.3 Management Framework Models <br />A Management framework model is a depiction of the relationship between the basin <br />stakeholders, Authority, Groundwater Management Plan, and the Groundwater Export <br />Ordinance. The following management framework models are depicted below. <br />7.3.1 Individual Interest-based <br />Depicted in Figure 7-1, an individual interest-based management framework reflects a <br />philosophy whereby stakeholders would govern and develop water resources projects <br />individually. Historically, this has been the approach to groundwater management and water <br />resources development in San Joaquin County. <br />In the individual interest-based model, water districts, cities, and other mutual partnerships are <br />free to develop and implement projects independently. Input from the public and comments <br />from other affected agencies are dealt with during regular or mandated outreach opportunities <br />or progress meetings. Individual entities may choose to develop projects pursuant to a regional <br />groundwater management plan. However, project decision-making authority would remain <br />exclusively within the jurisdiction of the entity sponsoring the project. Fund raising would also <br />be the sole responsibility of the sponsoring entity. <br />The individual interest-based management approach allows agencies to focus their resources <br />on projects specific to its needs; however, this approach may hinder the ability for agencies to <br />coordinate project development in order to best meet the needs of the involved agencies and <br />the region. Competition for State and federal funding is also an issue as projects demonstrating <br />broad benefits to multiple agencies are given funding priority over narrowly scoped projects <br />developed by individual entities. <br /> <br />Figure 7-1 Individual Interest-based Model <br /> <br />Outreach Opportunity <br />Water Districts Cities Partnerships <br />Public Input Comments <br />Project Project Project