SU0014681 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t. vement.setions are d the scop Response: Traffic Index and maintenance of they guidelines tru trucks we eecon converted intoe of a traffic study. Consistent with our traffic study g equivalent passenger vehicles. Comment number 3: Fair Share Calculations-The soestimates of fair share in Table 38 of the dy incorrectly calculated the report used the needed improvement co project traffic volume divided by the total cumulative plus project volume. ore Co ty established that roadway improvements were needed in San Joaquin Impact Mitigation Fee result of future development. The San Joaquin County Traffic Imp g (TIME)is based on this finding. Therefore,the project's fair share should be calculated by dividing the project trips by the net increase in traffic by 2010. This will produce a higher ADT Automotive share of needed cumulative mitigation. Response: The County's Traffic Study Guidelines are very specific on the method of calculating fair share. the number off"pro"project generated trips" at a location share responsibility,in the near eis y the total determined by dividing �� number of trips at that location for the"existing plus'approved plus project. For the cumulative impacts, divide the number of project generated trips by "cumulative plus project" condition. Korve Engineering followed the Guidelines as directed by County staff. Comment number 4: TUff Fees-The report does not the fee acknowledge calculated that the project won a fee ell er t requiredrip s due o the TIMF fees. It is recommended TIME fee would be 4,74 trips (ADT Automotive unique use being proposed. 2000 TIMF Update) or Traffic Study,Table 7,pg. 15)times$184.17 per trip $868,177.38. Response: The County's conditions of approval require the applicant to pay the TIMF fees as specified above. Comment number 5: direct funding of Offset Program-The Mountain House Community is providing improvements within and near its Sphere of Influence. ThV meat Fee are The funded through the Mountain House Transportation Imp es that all MHTIF includes a mitigation Offset Program. Thus Offset Programomein the Mitigation of development impacting the regional roadway system must participate tomotive project should be required tc cumulative�some of h the roads i )participate since ncluded in the Offset Program We have attached Table it will imp a fair I from OPTRANS to illustrate the project's share of the offset Program costs. Th share percentages have been calculated based on the project'share of hour volumes sine r daily as discussed above. The percentages have been based on PM p