My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014681
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
25533
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PP-99-02
>
SU0014681
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2022 3:23:02 PM
Creation date
1/25/2022 9:25:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014681
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
PP-99-02
STREET_NUMBER
25533
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
TRACY
APN
20909037
ENTERED_DATE
12/27/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
25533 S MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\jcastaneda
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN <br /> DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS THOMAS R.FLINN <br /> DEPUTY DIRECTOR <br /> •�`4 :.—. :a • P.O.BOX 1810-1810 E.HAZELTON AVENUE <br /> ��FOPM STOCKTON,CALIFORNIA 95201 <br /> MANUEL LOPEZ (209)468-3000 THOMAS hi.GAU <br /> DIRECTOR FAX(209)468-2999 DEPUTY DIRECTOR <br /> STEVEN WINKLER <br /> DEPUTY DIRECTOR <br /> August 25,2000 <br /> RECEIVED <br /> MEMORANDUM AUG 2 5 2000 <br /> TO: Chandler Martin Community Development.Dept. <br /> Community Development Department <br /> FROM: Gabriel Karam, Senior Civil Engineer G+c <br /> Public Services Division <br /> SUBJECT: Response to Comments (Mountain House Community Services District) <br /> The following is a list of the comments followed by a response from Public works: <br /> Comment number 1: <br /> Approved Project Assumptions- The-analysis does not consider any near term <br /> development within the Mountain House Community. As a minimum, the analysis <br /> should consider the development of Neighborhood F, which is expected to start <br /> construction in the near future. <br /> Response: The County's Traffic Study Guidelines require Traffic Consultants to evaluate <br /> traffic impacts for the "existing plus approved projects plus project condition." The 1. <br /> County hired Korve Engineering on October 19, 1999,to prepare a traffic study for the <br /> ADT project, at that time Neighborhood F, did not have an approved "Small <br /> Lot" tentative map for development. Therefore, neighborhood F was not considered in <br /> the traffic analysis for the near term, but was projected for the 2020 cumulative scenario <br /> analysis.Additionally, the applicant will contribute his fair share of improvements for <br /> both,near-term and long-term impacts prior to release of the building permit. <br /> Comment number 2: <br /> Truck Impacts-The analysis of project trip generation identifies the number of trucks <br /> anticipated with the proposed project. However,the impact of this truck traffic on the <br /> Pavement section has not been evaluated. It is likely that the project truck traffic could 4 <br /> impact the section of Mountain House Parkway between the project and I-205. The <br /> impacts of the project on the existing and future Traffic Index should be evaluated. The <br /> project should be required to mitigate any changes to the required pavement section. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.