SU0014621 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

adjacent undeveloped properties, the City should consider the establishment of an area of benefit and resolve a method to pro-rate the costs of the installation. This could be accomplished by creation of an assessment district, or a direct reimbursement program. Waste Water Disposal - The project will have a cumulatively adverse e ect on the capacity of the City's regional wastewater treatment facility and on the existing sewer line network. The designed capacity of the City's wastewater treatment facility is 61 million gallons per day (MGD) for a "maximum work month." At present, flows during a "maximum work Month" average about 45 MGD (Linn Norton, Telecon) . The existing 48" sewer trunk line which would serve the project has a capacity of 16 MGD. A study is currently being conducted by the consulting firm of Nolte and Associates to analyze the overall sewer system capacity for the City of Stockton. The results of the study regarding the current flows of the 48" line are not yet available. The maximum sewage flows from the project under the currently approved tentative map (685 single family lots and 7.0 acres for planned development @ 8.7 DU/AC) would be approximately 0.20 MGD. The maximum sewage flows under the current R-1 zoning based upon 5,000 SF lots, would be about 0.36 MGD (157.3 x 8.7 = 1,368 x. 3.5 z 75 = 359,100) . The presently proposed PURD project -with 1500 dwelling units at full development would have maximum sewage flows of about 0.39 MGD. Using a peaking factor of 2.6, the above flows would be 0.52 MGD, 0.94 MGD and 1.03 MGD, respectively. The City's Municipal Utilities Department has indicated that there is adequate capacity within the treatment plant and sewer line to accommodate the project without significant adverse effects. MITIGATION: The project developer should construct the sewage collection system based upon the preliminary study and calculations as indicated in Appendix G. (A reduced copy of this preliminary study is included herein as an exhibit, page 24.) If the consultant's study of the overall sewer system capacities discloses that the 48" trunk line has insufficient capacity for ultimate buildout, the project proponent should commit the property to participate in its fair share of the costs for the additional capacity required. Water Supply - California Water Service Company's letter (Appendix A-4) suggest that first development on the property should be in the area of Lever Boulevard as it "best fits this Company's initial extension of facilities. " They also state that service to the development may be contingent upon the availability of a water storage site for purchase by the company, and that all line extensions would be subjected to the California P.U.C. rules in effect at the time. 23