My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2022
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0513594
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2022 4:23:59 PM
Creation date
2/14/2022 12:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2022
RECORD_ID
PR0513594
PE
2229
FACILITY_ID
FA0007670
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
15902010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPX CORPORATION ORDER R5-2019-0018 <br /> SPX MARLEY COOLING TECHNOLOGIES GROUNDWATER CLEANUP NPDES NO. CA0081787 <br /> reasonable potential to cause, or contribute to an excursion above any <br /> State water quality standard, including State narrative criteria for water <br /> quality." For priority pollutants, the SIP dictates the procedures for <br /> conducting the RPA. pH is not a priority pollutant. Therefore, the Central <br /> Valley Water Board is not restricted to one particular RPA method. Due to <br /> the site-specific conditions of the discharge, the Central Valley Water <br /> Board has used its judgment in determining the appropriate method for <br /> conducting the RPA for this non-priority pollutant constituent. <br /> USEPA's September 2010 NPDES Permit Writer's Manual, page 6-30, <br /> states, "State implementation procedures might allow, or even require, a <br /> permit writer to determine reasonable potential through a qualitative <br /> assessment process without using available facility-specific effluent <br /> monitoring data or when such data are not available...A permitting <br /> authority might also determine that WQBELs are required for specific <br /> pollutants for all facilities that exhibit certain operational or discharge <br /> characteristics (e.g., WQBELs for pathogens in all permits for POTWs <br /> discharging to contact recreational waters)." USEPA's TSD also <br /> recommends that factors other than effluent data should be considered in <br /> the RPA, "When determining whether or not a discharge causes, has the <br /> reasonable potential to cause, or contributes to an excursion of a numeric <br /> or narrative water quality criterion for individual toxicants or for toxicity, the <br /> regulatory authority can use a variety of factors and information where <br /> facility-specific effluent monitoring data are unavailable. These factors <br /> also should be considered with available effluent monitoring data." (TSD, <br /> p. 50) <br /> The Facility is a ground water extraction and treatment system that treats <br /> contaminated groundwater. Although the Discharger has proper pH <br /> controls in place, the pH for the Facility's influent varies due to the nature <br /> of the groundwater being treated, which provides the basis for the <br /> discharge to have a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in- <br /> stream excursion above the Basin Plan's numeric objective for pH in the <br /> receiving water. Therefore, WQBELs for pH are required in this Order. <br /> (c) WQBEL's. Effluent limitations for pH of 6.5 as an instantaneous minimum <br /> and 8.5 as an instantaneous maximum are included in this Order based <br /> on protection of the Basin Plan objectives for pH. <br /> (d) Plant Performance and Attainability. Based on available effluent pH <br /> data, it appears the Discharger is able to comply with these limitations. <br /> The Central Valley Water Board concludes, therefore, that immediate <br /> compliance with these effluent limitations is feasible. <br /> 4. WQBEL Calculations <br /> a. This Order includes WQBEL's for electrical conductivity, copper, chromium VI, and <br /> pH. The general methodology for calculating WQBEL's based on the different <br /> criteria/objectives is described in subsections IV.C.4.b through e, below. See <br /> Attachment H for the WQBEL calculations. <br /> b. Effluent Concentration Allowance. For each water quality criterion/objective, the <br /> ECA is calculated using the following steady-state mass balance equation from <br /> ATTACHMENT F- FACT SHEET F-27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.