My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0000263
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
12982
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-89-05
>
SU0000263
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:58:39 PM
Creation date
5/13/2022 2:10:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0000263
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-89-05
STREET_NUMBER
12982
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
ENTERED_DATE
9/18/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
12982 S HWY 99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mary Walters said she has lived on the property alone for five years <br /> and there have been some very frightening experiences there. She <br /> wants to keep her home but she cannot stay there if she does not have <br /> a close neighbor . <br /> OPPONENTS: Staff noted that a letter had been received from Joe <br /> Marchesotti in opposition to another residential homesite in a farming <br /> area. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED <br /> Chairman Bozzano commented that this is a reasonable request but there <br /> is a question of whether or not it meets the owner/operator section of <br /> the ordinance. <br /> Comm. Gillispie commented that this seems to be a request for a <br /> variance to something that is written and fairly well interpreted. He <br /> said he could not support this request. <br /> Comm. Morri said he viewed the property and understood the security <br /> problem. However, he said he did not see how the Commission could <br /> approve this request. <br /> Comm. Jungeblut commented that if there was some proof that Mary <br /> Walters was paying agricultural bills he could find that she was an <br /> owner/operator . <br /> Comm. Rojas said he did not agree with Comm. Jungeblut ' s statement. <br /> Comm. Morri said the property is not being farmed. <br /> Comm. Gillispie commented that Ms. Walters also pays the taxes on the <br /> property but that does not make her an operator. <br /> Comm. Morri suggested that the applicant plant pumpkins on the pro- <br /> perty to qualify as an owner/operator. <br /> MOTION: Moved, seconded (Morri-Rojas ) and carried by a vote of 5-0 to <br /> deny the project without prejudice. Comms . Carter and Gabbard absent. <br /> --------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> PC: 10/6/88 -4- MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.