Laserfiche WebLink
Values and Assumptions: <br />I = 12,000 gals/yr = 1,604.3 cu ft = 0.003 in/yr <br />145.91 Ac x 43,560 sq ft/Ac x (1 ft/l2 in) <br />Nw = 90 mg N/L <br />d = 31% denitrification factor based on the nitrate -nitrogen concentration reduction observed in the backhoe test pit <br />soil analysis from the initial SSNL Studies. <br />R = 8.82 in/yr <br />Nb = Assumed to be 0.1 ppm NO3-N <br />(0.003 in/�r ((90 mg N/L) 0 - 0.31) + (8.82 x 0.1 mg/LZ <br />Nr = (0.003 in/yr + 8.82 in/yr) <br />Nr = 0.121 ppm as nitrate -nitrogen (NO3-N); 0.537 ppm as nitrate. <br />IV. OWTS OPERATIONAL DESIGN PARAMETERS AND COMPONENTS <br />A. PROPOSED OWTS OPERATION <br />SSS§ 3.7. Influent from the toilet and sink will gravity flow to a 1,200 gallon standard (two piece) <br />septic tank. Effluent from this tank will flow to a Distribution box (D -box) inside the filter bed, as <br />illustrated on the design plans. Equal effluent flow will gravity through two perforated pipes with <br />both ends capped or connected with 90' elbows and a perforated crossover pipe. <br />B. FILTER BED SIZING CALCULATIONS <br />To maintain a small, rectangular footprint for effluent disposal, a filter bed structure is proposed to <br />be installed. The filter bed must be installed under the setback requirements promulgated in Section <br />1.5 of the OWTS Standards: The vertical ht of the Distillation Area Facility and Control Room <br />building pad area is 3 ft; therefore, the west edge of the filter bed must be a minimum of - <br />3 ft x 4 = 12 ft from the top edge of the embankment, which will be easily achieved. <br />Due to the fact that the wastewater flow volumes from the Restroom will be extremely small, the <br />filter bed area is based on the parameters also promulgated in the EHD OWTS StandardE: Section <br />9.7.3 specifies dispersal field application rates for engineer designed systems may be determined by <br />the pert rate. The final pert rate after four hours of testing was 250 min/in. But as noted, in the <br />first one-half hour of testing, the soil accepted 1.56 inches, or 19.2 min/in. <br />The receiving soils readily accept water, but due to its compacted state and high magnesium <br />content, the rate slows precipitously over time. It is my professional engineering judgment that an <br />application rate of 0.1 gals/sf/day is acceptable to be used as an acceptance rate. Therefcre, the <br />calculation for the disposal area becomes: <br />Paiae -6- <br />Chesney Consulting <br />