My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0085228_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
17000
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0085228_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:59:57 PM
Creation date
5/19/2022 2:52:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0085228
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
17000
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
24506042
ENTERED_DATE
5/3/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17000 E HWY 120
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADF of 40 gpd _ 0.1 gals/sf/day = 400 sf of filter bed area needed to manage the extremely low <br />ADF of 40 gpd. The filter bed is to be constructed 40 ft N -S and 10 ft E -W, as illustrated on the <br />design plans. <br />There is ample area for the 100% reserve replacement area, which has been situated directly north <br />of the primary filter bed location, also illustrated on the design plans. <br />V. CONCLUSIONS <br />NLS§ 4.2, SSS§ 6.7, SSS§ 5.4, 6.8. Soil compaction, along with a high magnesium content soil, <br />have contributed to a failing percolation rate. Consequently, the proposed OWTS for this project <br />must be an engineered system. The effluent flow volumes are anticipated to be extremely small. <br />Although calculations have been presented illustrating potential maximum use of the Restroom, if it <br />is determined in the future that flows are heavier than predicted and the filter bed fails, the <br />replacement area must be enlarged. If this procedure is done, the additional area must be <br />reconstructed with engineered fill to alleviate the soil compaction/magnesium content. <br />NLS§ 4.1. The nitrate loading calculated for the original Studies found the nitrate impact to be <br />2.74 ppm as nitrate -nitrogen (NO3-N); 12.3 ppm as nitrate. This Addendum Study found the <br />impact to be 0.121 ppm as nitrate -nitrogen (NO3-N); 0.537 ppm as nitrate. Therefore, the <br />nitrate -nitrogen impact produced on, and emanating from the subject Parcel is 2.86 ppm; 12.73 as <br />nitrate; well below the Federal nitrate -nitrogen Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 10 ppm <br />NO3-N, or 45 ppm as nitrate. <br />This low nitrate impact potential is due to the large Parcel area of 145.91 acres. In quantifying <br />nitrate loading, a well-defined area that has a nitrogen source, or sources must be defined. This is <br />typically the APN Parcel under inquiry. <br />Nothing is to be stored on, and no vehicles are to be driven over, or parked upon the septic tank and <br />the filter bed. The filter bed must be barricaded to prevent this from occurring. <br />-7- <br />Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.