SU0014674 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Table 1 COMPARISON OF 1994 MASTER EIR PROJECT TO CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD F PROPOSAL 1994 Master EIR for Neighborhood F (Adjusted based on Neighborhood F boundary changes and the addition of office and industrial Current areas in Neighborhood F Land Use Neighborhood F) Proposal Differences Residential Low density 142 ac;674 du 142 ac; 598 du 0 acres;-71 units Medium density 66.4 ac;465 du 66.4 ac;380 du 0 acres;-85 units High density 24 ac; 432 du 24 ac;480 du' 0 acres;+48 du Total 232.4 ac; 1,571 du 232.4 ac; 1,458 du No difference in residential Residential acreage. Total difference in units is—113. Difference due to the Master EIR's use of maximum density in calculating Low Density and Medium Density units,and the use of minimum density in calculating High Density units.' Commercial Neighborhood Commercial 1.5 ac 2.9 ac . acres 1.2 acres Community Commercial 19.0 ac 17.8 ac -1.2 Office commercial 30.4 ac 30.4 ac Total 50.9 ac 51.1 Difference in Neigh.Comm. Commercial acreage due to use of 1.6 acres for a recreation facility. At the time of the 1994 Master EIR,this recreation facility was not addressed. Difference in Community Commercial is 6.50/6. Industrial Limited Industrial areas 35.4 35.4 0 acres Open Space Neighborhood Parks 5.0 ac 5.0 ac 0 acres Community Parks 11.0 ac 15.0 ac +5 acres Total Open 16.0 ac 20.0 Difference in Community Park Space acreage due to the use of 15 acres for a temporary sports park facility for Neighborhood F. Schools K-g 16.0 ac 15.9 No significant difference. Public Facilities CivicAnstitutional 3.0 ac 2.9 No significant difference. TOTAL 353.7 ac; 1,571 du 357.7 ac; 1,458 du I See comments above. 1 Does not include 64 second units or density bonus units(for both 1994 Master EIR and current proposal). 2 In terms of units actually planned for Neighborhood F,the current proposal is within the density ranges allowed for each land use category. 6 �■