Laserfiche WebLink
time for widening from two to four lanes. The added mitigation measures are to be <br /> incorporated into the environmental documentation for the Neighborhood "F"project <br /> which will be tiered onto the MSIR. As such, no major revisions are needed to the MSIR <br /> to incorporate these changes. <br /> Some roadway segments have improved levels of service that now require no mitigation <br /> improvements for 2010. However, it is expected that these improvements will still be <br /> needed in the future beyond 2010. The Master Plan and MEIR require a full traffic <br /> impact analysis for each Specific Plan; and at this time, by the latest, additional traffic <br /> studies will be prepared for cumulative traffic impacts with an expanded time frame. <br /> Finding: There is no new available information of substantial importance which was not <br /> known and could not have been known at the time the Mountain House New Communitv <br /> Master Plan and Specific Plan I EIR was certified. <br /> CEQA Requirements:To more clearly address the required findings above, Section <br /> 15162 of CEQA has been addressed below. This section deals with Subsequent EIRs and <br /> Negative Declarations but defines more clearly the issues of "new available information <br /> of substantial importance." <br /> (3) New information ofsubstantial importance, which was not known and could not <br /> have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the <br /> previous EIR was certified as complete shows any of the following: <br /> (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the <br /> previous EIR or negative declaration; <br /> (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe <br /> than shown in the previous EIR; <br /> (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible <br /> would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more <br /> significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to <br /> adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or <br /> (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably d fferent from <br /> those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or <br /> more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents <br /> decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. <br /> Statement of Fact: <br /> The initial study prepared for the Neighborhood F project identified no new significant <br /> effects that were not already discussed in the 1 E=. The initial study conducted for the <br /> Neighborhood "F"evaluated the information, impacts and mitigation measures contained <br /> in the MEIR. The Initial Study identified three areas where there was new information, <br /> geology and cumulative growth. Studies were prepared for noise and traffic thereby <br /> generating new information for these areas. The new information identified below does <br /> not result in the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR. <br /> A-7 Appendix A <br />