My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014674
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
20043
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-00-03
>
SU0014674
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2022 4:34:36 PM
Creation date
6/16/2022 3:22:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014674
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
SU-00-03
STREET_NUMBER
20043
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
TRACY
APN
20908020
ENTERED_DATE
12/21/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20043 MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
future beyond 2010. The Master Plan and MSIR require a full traffic impact analysis for <br /> each Specific Plan; and at this time, by the latest, additional traffic studies will be <br /> prepared for cumulative traffic impacts with an expanded time frame. <br /> An updated noise study for Neighborhood "F" was prepared using the updated traffic <br /> data in compliance with MEIR mitigation measure4.14-1. The noise study showed <br /> increased 60 and 65 db noise contours for Mascot Boulevard, De Anza Boulevard and <br /> Mountain House Boulevard. As a result, higher noise walls or greater setbacks than <br /> originally adopted are needed. Such new information was required by the MSIR to refine <br /> the general noise mitigation identified in the MEIR and previous SEIR. The proposed <br /> noise mitigation measures for Neighborhood "F"thereby fine tune previous mitigation <br /> measures and do not constitute new information of substantial importance requiring <br /> preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR. <br /> The initial study has not identified any mitigation measures or alternatives previously <br /> found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or <br /> more significant effects of the project. Nor have any mitigation measures or alternatives <br /> which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous MEIR been <br /> identified that would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the <br /> environment. <br /> In summary, the new geological and updated traffic and noise information does not result <br /> in new significant effects not discussed in the MSIR. The traffic impacts identified in the <br /> updated traffic study are equivalent or lower in impact in 22 of 24 arterial road segments. <br /> While higher impacts were identified along two road segments, the general effects of <br /> cumulative development were discussed in the MSIR and the two road segments will be <br /> mitigated on a similar basis as other road segment mitigations. (See chapters 4.12 and 6 <br /> of the MSIR) Noise impacts of traffic were discussed in the EIR(see chapter 4.14 of the <br /> MSIR) which required additional noise studies for Specific Plans or Development Plans. <br /> The outcome of such noise studies with its recommendations for raised mitigation <br /> measures, is therefore within the mitigation of the EIR and not new impacts. The new <br /> geological information about the Great Valley Fault Zone does not result in new impacts <br /> for impacts resulting from seismic events were discussed in the MEIR and its mitigation <br /> measures are sufficient to mitigate the potential impacts of the fault. (See chapter 4.6 of <br /> the MEIR). <br /> A-9 Appendix A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.