Laserfiche WebLink
before Central Parkway, and along the entrances to Tradition Street and Providence Street; a 10- <br /> foot soundwall along the west side of De Anza Boulevard from Mountain House Boulevard to <br /> Mascot Boulevard; an 8-foot soundwall along the north side of Mascot Boulevard from De Anza <br /> Boulevard to the fire station property, and along the entrances to Tradition Street and Prosperity <br /> Street; a 6-foot to 8-foot soundwall along the north side of the recreational facility-neighborhood <br /> commercial property; a 6-foot to 8-foot soundwall along the south side of Wicklund Crossing; and <br /> a 6-foot soundwall along the east and north sides of the fire station property. <br /> If the Planning Commission determines that an outdoor noise level standard of 65 dB Ldn should <br /> be used in certain instances in order to reduce soundwall height, the 10-foot soundwall along De <br /> Anza Boulevard would be reduced to 7 feet, and the 8-foot soundwalls to 6-7 feet. (Note: Use of <br /> the 65 dB Ldn standard is permitted by the Master Plan, Section 11.3.1 (e), if it is not possible to <br /> reduce noise in outdoor activity areas to 60dB Ldn or less using practical application of the best <br /> available noise reduction measures.) If this decision is implemented, Trimark would be required to <br /> notify affected residents that the outdoor sound level has not been reduced to the design goal of <br /> 60dB Ldn. <br /> As an alternative to constructing soundwalls greater than 6 feet in height, Trimark could increase <br /> the setback of homes farther from De Anza Boulevard and Mountain House Boulevard. Increasing <br /> the setback would allow a lower soundwall height to achieve the desired exterior noise <br /> environment, but would entail a redesign of the proposed project. <br /> 13. Air Quality <br /> To reduce impacts to air quality, the proposed project would be subject to the policies and <br /> requirements of the Master Plan, the Transportation Demand Management(TDM) Program, the <br /> Transit Plan, the Congestion Management Plan (CMP), and other applicable plans. The proposed <br /> project would not conflict with the applicable clean air plans of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air <br /> Pollution Control District(SJVUAPCD). <br /> (Note: At the time of certification of the 1994 EIR, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was <br /> prepared for significant impacts to regional air quality that could not be mitigated to a less-than- <br /> significant level by mitigation measures. These same significant and unavoidable impacts would <br /> remain for the proposed project; however, they do not require additional findings or the <br /> preparation of an EIR because the 1994 EIR adequately addressed the issue. The proposed <br /> project would not increase impacts identified earlier.) <br /> Although the proposed project would be subject to the policies and requirements of all applicable <br /> plans to reduce impacts to air quality,future residents of the proposed project could be exposed to <br /> agriculturally-relatedemissions generated outside its boundaries. Dust and particulate matter <br /> associated with agricultural activities such as tilling,mowing and soil preparation would be carried <br /> onto the site where its deposition would soil exposed surfaces and potentially irritate residents with <br /> pre-existing lung problems. This would be especially true on the west side of the proposed project <br /> site where high winds that normally blow from the west amplify dust generation. <br /> To the extent possible,Trimark would endeavor to mitigate these impacts. Lands to the west of the <br /> proposed project site,just west of the proposed Central Parkway,would be set aside as a <br /> agricultural buffer and planted with a fallow crop such as alfalfa to minimize dust generation.The <br /> proposed agricultural buffer,varying would vary in width from 100 feet to as much as 1,600 feet, <br /> would be adequate to minimize dust for on-site residents of the proposed project(see Figure 8). <br /> Residents at the east side of the proposed project would be separated from agricultural operations <br /> by commercial/industrial uses and Mountain House Parkway. Tree plantings proposed along <br /> Mountain House Parkway would also help to reduce dust emissions from agricultural operations. <br /> -13- <br />