SU0014674 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

lawsuits were filed challenging the MEIR on other grounds. However, each lawsuit was dismissed after a full trial on the merits. The MEIR provides evidence that the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. The County finds that it is reasonable to rely upon conclusions of the certified EIR. In addition, the County Planning Department staff independently reviewed the physical suitability of the site for the Map and concluded that the site was physically suitable. In reaching this conclusion the County also reviewed the various engineering, hydrology and soil suitability studies that have been prepared and reviewed for this project. THE DESIGN OF THE MAP OR TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT LIKELY TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE OR SUBSTANTIALLY AND AVOIDABLY INJURE FISH OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT. 5. The County finds that the design of the Map or the type of improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injury fish or wildlife or their habitat. The County incorporates by this reference as though set out in full the FINDINGS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (CEQA Findings), as approved for the Neighborhood F Project. The County also incorporates by this reference as though set out in full the 1999 Expanded Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH 98032027)prepared for the use permit for the wastewater facility. THE DESIGN OF THE MAP OR TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT LIKELY TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE OR SUBSTANTIALLY AND AVOIDABLY INJURE FISH OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT. 6. The County finds that the Map or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. In making this finding, the County observes that the design of the Map and the types of improvements were subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. The Initial Study concluded that the Map would not cause serious public health problems. In addition, the Local Health Department reviewed the Map and concluded that, in their independent opinion, the Map would not result in a serious public health problem. THE DESIGN OF THE MAP OR THE TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH EASEMENTS, ACQUIRED BY THE PUBLIC AT LARGE, FOR ACCESS THROUGH OR USE OF, PROPERTY WITHIN THE MAP. 7. The County finds that the design of the Map or the type of improvements will not conflict with the easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, 3